Cited by 66Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationMesenchymal stem cell research

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts exhibit extensive developmental and phenotypic diversity

Open access
Singhal, Prabhat K., Sassi, Slim, Lan, Lan, Au, Patrick, Halvorsen, Stefan C., Fukumura, Dai, Jain, Rakesh K., Seed, Brian·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Embryonic fibroblasts have long been considered a relatively homogeneous cell type, and many studies have been conducted on fibroblasts of varying provenance. The results of the present study indicate that embryonic fibroblasts are highly heterogeneous and exhibit anatomic and developmental variation that has both practical consequences for the interpretation of experimental results and theoretical implications for the nature and organization of metazoan organisms. Studies using embryonic fibroblasts to explore the consequences of altered alleles should take into account the possibility that fibroblast composition may be altered by allele expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1522401112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mouse embryonic skin mesenchymal and epithelial cells are composed of heterogeneous cell populations.

    “Because both mesenchymal and epithelial cells from mouse embryonic skin are composed of heterogeneous cell populations (52, 53)”

    From Reprogramming of three-dimensional microenvironments for in vitro hair follicle induction (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Significance section reports that mouse embryonic fibroblasts are highly heterogeneous, supporting the mesenchymal-cell portion at a broader level. The cited passages do not establish heterogeneity specifically in embryonic skin or in its epithelial cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Dvorak HF, Weaver VM, Tlsty TD, Bergers G (2011) Tumor microenvironment and progression. J Surg Oncol 103(6):468-474.
  2. Öhlund D, Elyada E, Tuveson D (2014) Fibroblast heterogeneity in the cancer wound. J Exp Med 211(8):1503-1523.
  3. Orimo A, Weinberg RA (2007) Heterogeneity of stromal fibroblasts in tumors. Cancer Biol Ther 6(4):618-619.
  4. Pickup M, Novitskiy S, Moses HL (2013) The roles of TGFβ in the tumour microenvi- ronment. Nat Rev Cancer 13(11):788-799.
  5. Wijten P, et al. (2013) High precision platelet releasate definition by quantita- tive reversed protein profiling: Brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 33(7): 1635-1638.
  6. Fukumura D, et al. (1998) Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells. Cell 94(6):715-725.
  7. Baddoo M, et al. (2003) Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from murine bone marrow by negative selection. J Cell Biochem 89(6):1235-1249.
  8. Conrad C, et al. (2009) Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells acquire a lymphendo- thelial phenotype and enhance lymphatic regeneration in vivo. Circulation 119(2): 281-289.
  9. Imaizumi Y, Amano I, Tsuruga E, Kojima H, Sawa Y (2010) Immunohistochemical examination for the distribution of podoplanin-expressing cells in developing mouse molar tooth germs. Acta Histochem Cytochem 43(5):115-121.
  10. Lv FJ, Tuan RS, Cheung KM, Leung VY (2014) Concise review: The surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 32(6):1408-1419.
  11. Tondreau T, et al. (2005) Mesenchymal stem cells derived from CD133-positive cells in mobilized peripheral blood and cord blood: Proliferation, Oct4 expression, and plasticity. Stem Cells 23(8):1105-1112.
  12. Reyes M, et al. (2002) Origin of endothelial progenitors in human postnatal bone marrow. J Clin Invest 109(3):337-346.
  13. Houlihan DD, et al. (2012) Isolation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells on the basis of expression of Sca-1 and PDGFR-α. Nat Protoc 7(12):2103-2111.
  14. Gruda MC, Kovary K, Metz R, Bravo R (1994) Regulation of Fra-1 and Fra-2 phos- phorylation differs during the cell cycle of fibroblasts and phosphorylation in vitro by MAP kinase affects DNA binding activity. Oncogene 9(9):2537-2547.
  15. Tsai RY, McKay RD (2002) A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferation in stem cells and cancer cells. Genes Dev 16(23):2991-3003.
  16. Abderrahim-Ferkoune A, et al. (2004) Transdifferentiation of preadipose cells into smooth muscle-like cells: Role of aortic carboxypeptidase-like protein. Exp Cell Res 293(2):219-228.
  17. Scanlan MJ, et al. (1994) Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(12):5657-5661.
  18. Van Vliet E, Melis M, Van Ewijk W (1984) Monoclonal antibodies to stromal cell types of the mouse thymus. Eur J Immunol 14(6):524-529.
  19. Van Vliet E, Melis M, Foidart JM, Van Ewijk W (1986) Reticular fibroblasts in peripheral lymphoid organs identified by a monoclonal antibody. J Histochem Cytochem 34(7): 883-890.
  20. Macosko EZ, et al. (2015) Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of indi- vidual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161(5):1202-1214.
  21. Arboleda-Velasquez JF, Valdez CN, Marko CK, D'Amore PA (2015) From pathobiology to the targeting of pericytes for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diab Rep 15(2):573.
  22. Patel-Hett S, D'Amore PA (2011) Signal transduction in vasculogenesis and de- velopmental angiogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 55(4-5):353-363.
  23. Yuan F, et al. (1994) Vascular permeability and microcirculation of gliomas and mammary carcinomas transplanted in rat and mouse cranial windows. Cancer Res 54(17):4564-4568.
  24. Koike N, et al. (2004) Tissue engineering: Creation of long-lasting blood vessels. Nature 428(6979):138-139.
  25. Pittenger MF, et al. (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284(5411):143-147.
  26. Kafienah W, Mistry S, Williams C, Hollander AP (2006) Nucleostemin is a marker of proliferating stromal stem cells in adult human bone marrow. Stem Cells 24(4): 1113-1120.
  27. Kaern M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, Collins JJ (2005) Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 6(6):451-464.
  28. Ratajczak MZ, Kucia M, Majka M, Reca R, Ratajczak J (2004) Heterogeneous pop- ulations of bone marrow stem cells: Are we spotting on the same cells from the different angles? Folia Histochem Cytobiol 42(3):139-146.
  29. Okamoto T, et al. (2002) Clonal heterogeneity in differentiation potential of im- mortalized human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 295(2): 354-361.
  30. Panepucci RA, et al. (2004) Comparison of gene expression of umbilical cord vein and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 22(7):1263-1278.
  31. Vogel W, et al. (2003) Heterogeneity among human bone marrow-derived mesen- chymal stem cells and neural progenitor cells. Haematologica 88(2):126-133.
  32. Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ (2001) Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self- renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(14):7841-7845.
  33. Chang HH, Hemberg M, Barahona M, Ingber DE, Huang S (2008) Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 453(7194): 544-547.
  34. Morita Y, Ema H, Nakauchi H (2010) Heterogeneity and hierarchy within the most primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. J Exp Med 207(6):1173-1182.
  35. Yamahara K, et al. (2008) Heterogeneic nature of adult cardiac side population cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371(4):615-620.
  36. Uezumi A, et al. (2006) Functional heterogeneity of side population cells in skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 341(3):864-873.
  37. Singh AM, Hamazaki T, Hankowski KE, Terada N (2007) A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25(10):2534-2542.
  38. Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Murakami K, Takahashi K, Niwa H (2008) Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135(5):909-918.
  39. Carter MG, et al. (2008) An in situ hybridization-based screen for heterogeneously expressed genes in mouse ES cells. Gene Expr Patterns 8(3):181-198.
  40. Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, Schier AF, Regev A (2015) Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol 33(5):495-502.
  41. Brown E, Munn LL, Fukumura D, Jain RK (2010) In vivo imaging of tumors. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 10.1101/pdb.prot5452. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singhal, P. K., Sassi, S., Lan, L., Au, P., Halvorsen, S. C., Fukumura, D., Jain, R. K., & Seed, B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
122-127
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2228436275
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (P01CA080124, R35CA197743)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK103879)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
embryonic fibroblasts, fibroblast heterogeneity, fibroblast subtypes, multipotency, surface phenotype, fibroblast-like cells, GFP reporter mice, cell sorting, cell culture propagation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Cell Separation, Embryo, Mammalian, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Mice, Transgenic, Phenotype, Pericytes, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review