The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Plant species have evolved a wide variety of flowering habits, each adapted to maximize reproductive success in their local environment. Even within a species, accessions from different environments can exhibit markedly different flowering behavior. In Arabidopsis , some accessions are rapid-cycling summer annuals, whereas others accessions are late flowering and vernalization responsive and thus behave as winter annuals. Two genes, FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ) and FRIGIDA ( FRI ), interact synergistically to confer the winter-annual habit. Previous work has shown that many summer-annual accessions contain null mutations in the FRI gene; thus it appears that these summer-annual accessions have arisen from winter-annual ancestors by losing FRI function. In this work we demonstrate that naturally occurring allelic variation in FLC has provided another route to the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis . We have identified two summer-annual accessions, Da (1)-12 and Shakhdara, that contain functional alleles of FRI , but are early flowering because of weak alleles of FLC . We have also determined that the weak allele of FLC found in Landsberg erecta is naturally occurring. Unlike accessions that have arisen because of loss-of-function mutations in FRI , the FLC alleles from Da (1)-12, Shakhdara, and Landsberg erecta are not nulls; however, they exhibit lower steady-state mRNA levels than strong alleles of FLC . Sequence analysis indicates that these weak alleles of FLC have arisen independently at least twice during the course of evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538
What Has Natural Variation Taught Us about Plant Development, Physiology, and Adaptation?
Alonso-Blanco, C., Aarts, M. G. M., Bentsink, L., Keurentjes, J. J. B., Reymond, M., Vreugdenhil, D., & Koornneef, M. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068114 · Cited by 478
Vernalization and epigenetics: how plants remember winter
Sung, S., & Amasino, R. M. (2004) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.010 · Cited by 326
Self-citationLiu, J., He, Y., Amasino, R., & Chen, X. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1217304 · Cited by 222
Self-citationCo-expression networks: graph properties and topological comparisons
Xulvi-Brunet, R., & Li, H. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp632 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Michaels, S. D., He, Y., Scortecci, K. C., & Amasino, R. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-08-06
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10102-10107
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1979936449
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1531467100
- The paper
- Michaels, S. D., He, Y., Scortecci, K. C., & Amasino, R. M. (2003). Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1531467100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.