Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming

Open access
Carey, Joanna C., Tang, Jianwu, Templer, Pamela H., Kroeger, Kevin D., Crowther, Thomas W., Burton, Andrew J., Dukes, Jeffrey S., Emmett, Bridget, Frey, Serita D., Heskel, Mary A., Jiang, Lifen, Machmuller, Megan B., Mohan, Jacqueline, Panetta, Anne Marie, Reich, Peter B., Reinsch, Sabine, Wang, Xin, Allison, Steven D., Bamminger, Chris, Bridgham, Scott, Collins, Scott L., de Dato, Giovanbattista, Eddy, William C., Enquist, Brian J., Estiarte, Marc, Harte, John, Henderson, Amanda, Johnson, Bart R., Larsen, Klaus Steenberg, Luo, Yiqi, Marhan, Sven, Melillo, Jerry M., Peñuelas, Josep, Pfeifer-Meister, Laurel, Poll, Christian, Rastetter, Edward, Reinmann, Andrew B., Reynolds, Lorien L., Schmidt, Inger K., Shaver, Gaius R., Strong, Aaron L., Suseela, Vidya, Tietema, Albert·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1605365113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Significance: One of the greatest challenges in projecting future shifts in the global climate is understanding how soil respiration rates will change with warming. Multiple experimental warming studies have explored this response, but no consensus has been reached. Based on a global synthesis of 27 experimental warming studies spanning nine biomes, we find that although warming increases soil respiration rates, there is limited evidence for a shifting respiration response with experimental warming. We also note a universal decline in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at soil temperatures >25 °C. Together, our data indicate that future respiration rates are likely to follow the current temperature response function, but higher latitudes will be more responsive to warmer temperatures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1605365113

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Carey, J. C., Tang, J., Templer, P. H., Kroeger, K. D., Crowther, T. W., Burton, A. J., Dukes, J. S., Emmett, B., Frey, S. D., Heskel, M. A., Jiang, L., Machmuller, M. B., Mohan, J., Panetta, A. M., Reich, P. B., Reinsch, S., Wang, X., Allison, S. D., Bamminger, C., Bridgham, S., Collins, S. L., de Dato, G., Eddy, W. C., Enquist, B. J., Estiarte, M., Harte, J., Henderson, A., Johnson, B. R., Larsen, K. S., Luo, Y., Marhan, S., Melillo, J. M., Peñuelas, J., Pfeifer-Meister, L., Poll, C., Rastetter, E., Reinmann, A. B., Reynolds, L. L., Schmidt, I. K., Shaver, G. R., Strong, A. L., Suseela, V., & Tietema, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-11-14
Volume
113
Issue
48
Pages
13797-13802
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1605365113
OpenAlex
W2554024477
Cited by
528
References
42
FWCI
47.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1605365113
The paper
Carey, J. C., Tang, J., Templer, P. H., Kroeger, K. D., Crowther, T. W., Burton, A. J., Dukes, J. S., Emmett, B., Frey, S. D., Heskel, M. A., Jiang, L., Machmuller, M. B., Mohan, J., Panetta, A. M., Reich, P. B., Reinsch, S., Wang, X., Allison, S. D., Bamminger, C., . . . Tietema, A. (2016). Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605365113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.