Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Retrospective analysis of natural products provides insights for future discovery trends

Open access
Pye, Cameron R., Bertin, Matthew J., Lokey, R. Scott, Gerwick, William H., Linington, Roger G.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Natural products research seems to be at a critical juncture in terms of its relevance to modern biological science. We have evaluated this landscape of chemical diversity to ask key questions, including the following. How has the rate of discovery of new natural products progressed over the past 70 y? Has natural product structural novelty changed as a function of time? Has the rate of novel discovery declined in recent years? Does exploring novel taxonomic space afford an advantage in terms of novel compound discovery? Is it possible to estimate how close we are to describing all of the chemical space covered by natural products? And, finally, is there still value in exploring natural products space for novel biologically active natural products?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1614680114

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Pye, C. R., Bertin, M. J., Lokey, R. S., Gerwick, W. H., & Linington, R. G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-05
Volume
114
Issue
22
Pages
5601-5606
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2611021352
Cited by
534
References
0
FWCI
33.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrospective analysis of natural products provides insights for future discovery trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1614680114
The paper
Pye, C. R., Bertin, M. J., Lokey, R. S., Gerwick, W. H., & Linington, R. G. (2017). Retrospective analysis of natural products provides insights for future discovery trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614680114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.