Cited by 76Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers

Open access
Guseva, Elizaveta, Zuckermann, Ronald N., Dill, Ken A.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance Today’s lifeforms are based on informational polymers, namely proteins and nucleic acids. It is thought that simple chemical processes on the early earth could have polymerized monomer units into short random sequences. It is not clear, however, what physical process could have led to the next level—to longer chains having particular sequences that could increase their own concentrations. We study polymers of hydrophobic and polar monomers, such as today’s proteins. We find that even some random sequence short chains can collapse into compact structures in water, with hydrophobic surfaces that can act as primitive catalysts, and that these could elongate other chains. This mechanism explains how random chemical polymerizations could have given rise to longer sequence-dependent protein-like catalytic polymers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1620179114

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies of mutual catalysis-based network systems, such as folding hetero-oligomers, do not account for homeostatic growth.

    “The same is true for several more recent studies of mutual catalysis-based network systems, exemplified by a paper on folding hetero-oligomers [40]. This describes how certain chains of mixed hydrophilic/hydrophobic monomers fold, then serve as mutual catalysts for the elongation of others, but the analyses provided do not account for homeostatic growth.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guseva, E., Zuckermann, R. N., & Dill, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-08-22
Volume
114
Issue
36
Pages
E7460-E7468
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2748771871
Cited by
76
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (MCB1344230)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
hydrophobic collapse, chain extension, origin of life, early Earth chemistry
MeSH terms
Origin of Life, Catalysis, Polymers, Proteins, Protein Folding, Prebiotics, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Polymerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review