CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Y genetic data support the Neolithic demic diffusion model

Open access
Chikhi, Lounès, Nichols, Richard A., Barbujani, Guido, Beaumont, Mark A.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.162158799PMC PMC123201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There still is no general agreement on the origins of the European gene pool, even though Europe has been more thoroughly investigated than any other continent. In particular, there is continuing controversy about the relative contributions of European Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers and of migrant Near Eastern Neolithic farmers, who brought agriculture to Europe. Here, we apply a statistical framework that we have developed to obtain direct estimates of the contribution of these two groups at the time they met. We analyze a large dataset of 22 binary markers from the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY), by using a genealogical likelihood-based approach. The results reveal a significantly larger genetic contribution from Neolithic farmers than did previous indirect approaches based on the distribution of haplotypes selected by using post hoc criteria. We detect a significant decrease in admixture across the entire range between the Near East and Western Europe. We also argue that local hunter-gatherers contributed less than 30% in the original settlements. This finding leads us to reject a predominantly cultural transmission of agriculture. Instead, we argue that the demic diffusion model introduced by Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza [Ammerman, A. J. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1984) The Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Populations in Europe (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton)] captures the major features of this dramatic episode in European prehistory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.162158799

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Zvelebil M. (2000) in Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Europe eds. Renfrew C. & Boyle K. (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Cambridge U.K.) pp. 57–79.
  2. Whittle A. (1996) Europe in the Neolithic (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge U.K.).
  3. Richards M., Corte-Real, H., Forster, P., Macaulay, V., Wilkinson-Herbots, H., Demaine, A., Papiha, S., Hedges, R., Bandelt, H. J. & Sykes, B. (1996) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 185-203.8659525
  4. 10.1016/S0002-9297(07)64303-1 · DOI
  5. Chikhi L., Destro-Bisol, G., Pascali, V., Baravelli, V., Dobosz, M. & Barbujani, G. (1998) Hum. Biol. 70, 643-657.9686478
  6. Barbujani G. & Chikhi L. (2000) in Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Europe eds. Renfrew C. & Boyle K. (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Cambridge U.K.) pp. 119–130.
  7. Semino O., Passarino, G., Brega, A., Fellous, M. & Santachiara-Benerecetti, A. S. (1996) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 964-968.8808616
  8. Pinhasi R. Foley R. A. & Mirazon L. M. (2000) in Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Europe eds. Renfrew C. & Boyle K. (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge U.K.) pp. 45–56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–323 of 323

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chikhi, L., Nichols, R. A., Barbujani, G., & Beaumont, M. A.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-08-07
Volume
99
Issue
17
Pages
11008-11013
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.162158799
PMC
PMC123201
OpenAlex
W2141571677
Cited by
327
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University College London
  • Università degli Studi di Ferrara
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Neolithic farmers, admixture, Neolithic transition, European prehistory
MeSH terms
Animals, Europe, Gene Frequency, Gene Pool, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Paleontology, Regression Analysis, Selection, Genetic, Y Chromosome, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review