The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference
Open accessAbstract
Mating induces profound changes in female insect behavior and physiology. In Drosophila melanogaster , mating causes a reduction in sexual receptivity and an elevation in egg production for at least 5 days. Injection of the seminal fluid sex peptide (SP) induces both responses in virgin females, but only for 1–2 days. The role of SP in eliciting the responses to mating remains to be elucidated. Functional redundancy between seminal fluid components may occur. In addition, mating with spermless males results in brief (1- to 2-day) post-mating responses, indicating either that there is a “sperm effect” or that sperm act as carriers for SP or other seminal fluid components. Here we used RNA interference to suppress SP expression, to determine whether SP is required to elicit full post-mating responses, the magnitude of responses due to other seminal fluid components, and whether SP accounts for the “sperm effect.” Receptivity was higher and egg production lower in females mated to SP knock-down males than in controls. Comparison with virgins showed that the responses were brief. SP is therefore required for normal magnitude and persistence of postmating responses. Sperm transfer and use were normal in mates of SP knock-down males, yet their post-mating responses were briefer than after normal matings, and similar to those reported in mates of spermless son-of-tudor males. The prolonged “sperm effect” on female receptivity and egg production is therefore entirely attributable to SP, but sperm are necessary for its occurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Cited by
Sex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster
Wigby, S., & Chapman, T. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.051 · Cited by 498
Self-citationRecent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior
Nässel, D. R., & Zandawala, M. (2019) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · Cited by 355
Wired for Sex: The Neurobiology of Drosophila Mating Decisions
Dickson, B. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159276 · Cited by 314
Biochemical Genetics and Genomics of Insect Esterases
Oakeshott, J. G., Claudianos, C., Campbell, P. M., Newcomb, R. D., & Russell, R. J. (2005) · Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science · doi:10.1016/b0-44-451924-6/00073-9 · Cited by 314
Sensory Neurons in the Drosophila Genital Tract Regulate Female Reproductive Behavior
Häsemeyer, M., Yapici, N., Heberlein, U., & Dickson, B. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.009 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, T., Bangham, J., Vinti, G., Seifried, B., Lung, O., Wolfner, M. F., Smith, H. K., & Partridge, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-07-31
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9923-9928
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1986033100
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1631635100
- The paper
- Chapman, T., Bangham, J., Vinti, G., Seifried, B., Lung, O., Wolfner, M. F., Smith, H. K., & Partridge, L. (2003). The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1631635100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.