The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes
Open accessAbstract
We use molecular dynamics simulations to study osmotically driven transport of water molecules through hexagonally packed carbon nanotube membranes. Our simulation setup comprises two such semipermeable membranes separating compartments of pure water and salt solution. The osmotic force drives water flow from the pure-water to the salt-solution compartment. Monitoring the flow at molecular resolution reveals several distinct features of nanoscale flows. In particular, thermal fluctuations become significant at the nanoscopic length scales, and as a result, the flow is stochastic in nature. Further, the flow appears frictionless and is limited primarily by the barriers at the entry and exit of the nanotube pore. The observed flow rates are high (5.8 water molecules per nanosecond and nanotube), comparable to those through the transmembrane protein aquaporin-1, and are practically independent of the length of the nanotube, in contrast to predictions of macroscopic hydrodynamics. All of these distinct characteristics of nanoscopic water flow can be modeled quantitatively by a 1D continuous-time random walk. At long times, the pure-water compartment is drained, and the net flow of water is interrupted by the formation of structured solvation layers of water sandwiched between two nanotube membranes. Structural and thermodynamic aspects of confined water monolayers are studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests
Lawton, R. O., Nair, U. S., Pielke, R. A., & Welch, R. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062459 · Cited by 1,169
Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films
Raviv, U., Laurat, P., & Klein, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35092523 · Cited by 660
Cited by
A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies
Pendergast, M. M., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00541j · Cited by 2,078
Designing Carbon Nanotube Membranes for Efficient Water Desalination
Corry, B. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp709845u · Cited by 1,017
Emerging desalination technologies for water treatment: A critical review
Subramani, A., & Jacangelo, J. G. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.032 · Cited by 959
Why Are Carbon Nanotubes Fast Transporters of Water?
Joseph, S., & Aluru, N. R. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl072385q · Cited by 834
Nanofluidics: what is it and what can we expect from it?
Eijkel, J. C. T., & Berg, A. V. D. (2005) · Microfluidics and Nanofluidics · doi:10.1007/s10404-004-0012-9 · Cited by 696
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalra, A., Garde, S., & Hummer, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-07-23
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10175-10180
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988568995
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1633354100
- The paper
- Kalra, A., Garde, S., & Hummer, G. (2003). Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633354100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.