Terminal attack trajectories of peregrine falcons are described by the proportional navigation guidance law of missiles
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Renowned as nature’s fastest predators, peregrines are famous for their high-speed stooping and swooping attack behaviors. We used miniature GPS receivers to track peregrines attacking dummy targets thrown by a falconer or towed by a drone and fitted a simulation describing the dynamics of the guidance system used in interception. We collected onboard video giving a falcon’s-eye view of the attacks and used this to validate our conclusions for attacks on live targets. Remarkably, we find that the terminal attack trajectories of peregrines are described by the same feedback law used by visually guided missiles, but with a tuning appropriate to their lower flight speed. Our findings have application to drones designed to remove other drones from protected airspace.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peregrine flight trajectories follow a guidance law called pure proportional navigation.
“It has been shown experimentally that the flight trajectories of peregrines follow a guidance law called pure proportional navigation (Brighton et al. 2017).”
From Sexual size dimorphism, prey morphology and catch success in relation to flight mechanics in the peregrine falcon: a simulation study (2019) · cites this paper as Brighton et al. 2017
The section ‘Peregrine Terminal Attack Trajectories Are Well Modeled by a PN Guidance Law’ reports that proportional navigation simulations reproduce much of the observed turning in peregrine attacks. The ‘Optimization of the Navigation Constant’ section calls the fitted model ‘pure PN,’ but notes that a trajectory generated by augmented PN could appear to follow pure PN when approximated by that model. The experiments therefore support a good fit to pure PN, not a definitive finding that the birds follow that exact law. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013 · Cited by 4,147 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [1]Mischiati M 2015 Internal models direct dragonfly interception steering Nature 517 333 338 25487153
- [2]Mizutani A Chahl JS Srinivasan MV 2003 Insect behaviour: Motion camouflage in dragonflies Nature 423 604 12789327
- [3]Olberg RM 2012 Visual control of prey-capture flight in dragonflies Curr Opin Neurobiol 22 267 271 22195994
- [4]Olberg RM Seaman RC Coats MI Henry AF 2007 Eye movements and target fixation during dragonfly prey-interception flights J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 193 685 693 17487492
- [5]Olberg RM Worthington AH Venator KR 2000 Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 186 155 162 10707313
- [6]Wardill TJ 2017 A novel interception strategy in a miniature robber fly with extreme visual acuity Curr Biol 27 854 859 28286000 PMC5364399
- [7]Tucker VA 2000 The deep fovea, sideways vision and spiral flight paths in raptors J Exp Biol 203 3745 3754 11076738
- [8]Tucker VA Tucker AE Akers K Enderson JH 2000 Curved flight paths and sideways vision in peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) J Exp Biol 203 3755 3763 11076739
- [9]Kane SA Zamani M 2014 Falcons pursue prey using visual motion cues: New perspectives from animal-borne cameras J Exp Biol 217 225 234 24431144 PMC3898623
- [10]Kane SA Fulton AH Rosenthal LJ 2015 When hawks attack: Animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies J Exp Biol 218 212 222 25609783 PMC4302165
- [11]Ghose K Horiuchi TK Krishnaprasad PS Moss CF 2006 Echolocating bats use a nearly time-optimal strategy to intercept prey PLoS Biol 4 e108 16605303 PMC1436025
- [12]Shneydor NA 1998 Missile Guidance and Pursuit: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control Woodhead Cambridge, UK
- [20]Lin H-T Ros IG Biewener AA 2014 Through the eyes of a bird: Modelling visually guided obstacle flight J R Soc Interface 11 20140239 24812052 PMC4032538
- [21]Lanchester BS Mark RF 1975 Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus) J Exp Biol 63 627 645 1214121
- [23]Haselsteiner AF Gilbert C Wang ZJ 2014 Tiger beetles pursue prey using a proportional control law with a delay of one half-stride J R Soc Interface 11 20140216 24718454 PMC4006266
- [24]Zhang SW Wang XA Liu ZL Srinivasan MV 1990 Visual tracking of moving targets by freely flying honeybees Vis Neurosci 4 379 386 2271450
- [27]O’Rourke CT Hall MI Pitlik T Fernández-Juricic E 2010 Hawk eyes I: Diurnal raptors differ in visual fields and degree of eye movement PLoS One 5 e12802 20877645 PMC2943905
- [33]Strydom R Singh SPN Srinivasan MV 2015 Biologically inspired interception: A comparison of pursuit and constant bearing strategies in the presence of sensorimotor delay Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics IEEE Piscataway, NJ 2442 2448
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pursuit and Evasion Strategies in the Predator–Prey Interactions of Fishes
Peterson, A. N., Soto, A. P., & McHenry, M. J. (2021) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icab116 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Mills, R., Hildenbrandt, H., Taylor, G. K., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“6 that has been found empirically in captive-bred peregrine falcons attacking artificial targets [15].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMills, R., Taylor, G. K., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2019) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.01979 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationEmergence of Collaborative Hunting via Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
Tsutsui, K., Takeda, K., & Fujii, K. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37660-3_15 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brighton, C. H., Thomas, A. L. R., & Taylor, G. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Graham K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-12-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 13495-13500
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5754800
- OpenAlex
- W2773666956
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Guidance and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
- Keywords
- Falco peregrinus, missile guidance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Eye Movements, Models, Theoretical, Movement, Predatory Behavior, Vision, Ocular, Falconiformes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review