The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper ( Pagrus auratus )
Open accessAbstract
Although the effects of overfishing on species diversity and abundance are well documented, threats to the genetic diversity of marine fish populations have so far been largely neglected. Indeed, there seems to be little cause for concern, as even “collapsed” stocks usually consist of several million individuals, whereas population genetics theory suggests that only very small populations suffer significant loss of genetic diversity. On the other hand, in many marine species the genetically effective population size ( N e ), which determines the genetic properties of a population, may be orders of magnitude smaller than the census population size ( N ). Here, microsatellite analyses of a time series of archived scales demonstrated a significant decline in genetic diversity in a New Zealand snapper population during its exploitation history. Effective population sizes estimated both from the decline in heterozygosity and from temporal fluctuations in allele frequency were five orders of magnitude smaller than census population sizes from fishery data. If such low N e / N ratios are commonplace in marine species, many exploited marine fish stocks may be in danger of losing genetic variability, potentially resulting in reduced adaptability, population persistence, and productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743
Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3598-0 · Cited by 3,068
Collapse and recovery of marine fishes
Hutchings, J. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35022565 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Lewin, W.-C., Arlinghaus, R., & Mehner, T. (2006) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641260600886455 · Cited by 668
The importance in fishery management of leaving the big ones
BIRKELAND, C., & DAYTON, P. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.015 · Cited by 573
Emerging Issues and Methodological Advances in Fisheries Reproductive Biology
Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., Brown-Peterson, N. J., Murua, H., Tomkiewicz, J., Wyanski, D. M., & Saborido-Rey, F. (2011) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1080/19425120.2011.555725 · Cited by 223
Riccioni, G., Landi, M., Ferrara, G., Milano, I., Cariani, A., Zane, L., Sella, M., Barbujani, G., & Tinti, F. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908281107 · Cited by 117
Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839)
Gonzalez, E. G., Beerli, P., & Zardoya, R. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-252 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, L., Adcock, G. J., Smith, P. J., Bernal Ramírez, J. H., & Carvalho, G. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-08-16
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 11742-11747
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1994250687
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper ( Pagrus auratus ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.172242899
- The paper
- Hauser, L., Adcock, G. J., Smith, P. J., Bernal Ramírez, J. H., & Carvalho, G. R. (2002). Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper ( Pagrus auratus ). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.172242899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.