The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Building a dictionary for genomes: Identification of presumptive regulatory sites by statistical analysis
Open accessAbstract
The availability of complete genome sequences and mRNA expression data for all genes creates new opportunities and challenges for identifying DNA sequence motifs that control gene expression. An algorithm, “MobyDick,” is presented that decomposes a set of DNA sequences into the most probable dictionary of motifs or words. This method is applicable to any set of DNA sequences: for example, all upstream regions in a genome or all genes expressed under certain conditions. Identification of words is based on a probabilistic segmentation model in which the significance of longer words is deduced from the frequency of shorter ones of various lengths, eliminating the need for a separate set of reference data to define probabilities. We have built a dictionary with 1,200 words for the 6,000 upstream regulatory regions in the yeast genome; the 500 most significant words (some with as few as 10 copies in all of the upstream regions) match 114 of 443 experimentally determined sites (a significance level of 18 standard deviations). When analyzing all of the genes up-regulated during sporulation as a group, we find many motifs in addition to the few previously identified by analyzing the subclusters individually to the expression subclusters. Applying MobyDick to the genes derepressed when the general repressor Tup1 is deleted, we find known as well as putative binding sites for its regulatory partners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans
Murphy, C. T., McCarroll, S. A., Bargmann, C. I., Fraser, A., Kamath, R. S., Ahringer, J., Li, H., & Kenyon, C. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01789 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationLiu, X. S., Brutlag, D. L., & Liu, J. S. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt717 · Cited by 667
Network component analysis: Reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems
Liao, J. C., Boscolo, R., Yang, Y.-L., Tran, L. M., Sabatti, C., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2136632100 · Cited by 601
Genome-Wide Mapping of the Cohesin Complex in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Glynn, E. F., Megee, P. C., Yu, H.-G., Mistrot, C., Unal, E., Koshland, D. E., DeRisi, J. L., & Gerton, J. L. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020259 · Cited by 431
Integrating regulatory motif discovery and genome-wide expression analysis
Conlon, E. M., Liu, X. S., Lieb, J. D., & Liu, J. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0630591100 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Bussemaker, H. J., Li, H., & Siggia, E. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-08-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10096-10100
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005244073
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a dictionary for genomes: Identification of presumptive regulatory sites by statistical analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.180265397
- The paper
- Bussemaker, H. J., Li, H., & Siggia, E. D. (2000). Building a dictionary for genomes: Identification of presumptive regulatory sites by statistical analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.180265397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.