The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice
Open accessAbstract
The reaction of cardiac tissue to acute injury involves interacting cascades of cellular and molecular responses that encompass inflammation, hormonal signaling, extracellular matrix remodeling, and compensatory adaptation of myocytes. Myocardial regeneration is observed in amphibians, whereas scar formation characterizes cardiac ventricular wound healing in a variety of mammalian injury models. We have previously shown that the MRL mouse strain has an extraordinary capacity to heal surgical wounds, a complex trait that maps to at least seven genetic loci. Here, we extend these studies to cardiac wounds and demonstrate that a severe transmural, cryogenically induced infarction of the right ventricle heals extensively within 60 days, with the restoration of normal myocardium and function. Scarring is markedly reduced in MRL mice compared with C57BL/6 mice, consistent with both the reduced hydroxyproline levels seen after injury and an elevated cardiomyocyte mitotic index of 10–20% for the MRL compared with 1–3% for the C57BL/6. The myocardial response to injury observed in these mice resembles the regenerative process seen in amphibians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preservation of contractile characteristics of human myocardium in multi-day cell culture
Janssen, P. M. L., Lehnart, S. E., Prestle, J., & Hasenfuss, G. (1999) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1006/jmcc.1999.0978 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Fibroblast Differentiation in Wound Healing and Fibrosis
Darby, I. A., & Hewitson, T. D. (2007) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(07)57004-x · Cited by 600
Cardiac Myocyte Cell Cycle Control in Development, Disease, and Regeneration
Ahuja, P., Sdek, P., & MacLellan, W. R. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2006 · Cited by 568
Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle Regulation
Pasumarthi, K. B. S., & Field, L. J. (2002) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000020201.44772.67 · Cited by 466
Cardiac Stem Cells and Mechanisms of Myocardial Regeneration
Leri, A., Kajstura, J., & Anversa, P. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2005 · Cited by 451
Degradation Products of Extracellular Matrix Affect Cell Migration and Proliferation
Reing, J. E., Zhang, L., Myers-Irvin, J., Cordero, K. E., Freytes, D. O., Heber-Katz, E., Bedelbaeva, K., McIntosh, D., Dewilde, A., Braunhut, S. J., et al. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0425 · Cited by 387
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leferovich, J. M., Bedelbaeva, K., Samulewicz, S., Zhang, X.-M., Zwas, D., Lankford, E. B., & Heber-Katz, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-08-07
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9830-9835
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1989238977
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.181329398
- The paper
- Leferovich, J. M., Bedelbaeva, K., Samulewicz, S., Zhang, X.-M., Zwas, D., Lankford, E. B., & Heber-Katz, E. (2001). Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181329398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.