Cited by 172CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene knockout in intestinal tumor organoids provides functional validation for colorectal cancer driver genes

Open access
Takeda, Haruna, Kataoka, Shiho, Nakayama, Mizuho, Ali, Mohamed A. E., Oshima, Hiroko, Yamamoto, Daisuke, Park, Jun-Won, Takegami, Yujiro +4 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Genome sequencing studies have provided comprehensive CRC genomic datasets; however, functional validation for most candidate CRC driver genes has not been performed. Here, we describe a platform for functionally validating CRC driver genes that utilizes CRISPR-Cas9 in mouse intestinal tumor organoids and human CRC-derived organoids. These studies showed Acvr1b , Acvr2a , and Arid2 could function as tumor suppressors in CRC. We also show that co-occurrent mutations in receptors for activin and transforming growth factor-β synergistically promote tumorigenesis, and shed light on the role of activin receptors. This experimental system can also be applied to organoids derived from other organs, which could further contribute to identification of novel cancer driver genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1904714116

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR cutting screens in 3D organoids have been implemented to explore factors such as growth factor dependency for cell growth, identify potential cancer-driving forces, and uncover key genetic events in cell differentiation.

    “Even more exciting is the implementation of CRISPR cutting screens in 3D organoids to explore factors such as growth factor dependency for cell growth14–16, identifying potential cancer-driving forces17–19, and uncovering key genetic events in cell differentiation20–22.”
  • CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as an efficient strategy for genome engineering and has been successfully used in model systems, including organoids, to study tumorigenesis.

    “CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as an efficient strategy for genome engineering and has been successfully used in model systems, including organoids, to study tumorigenesis13–16.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 172

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. J. L. Bos, ras oncogenes in human cancer: A review. Cancer Res. 49, 4682-4689 (1989).
  2. J. Bauer, J. C. Sporn, J. Cabral, J. Gomez, B. Jung, Effects of activin and TGFβ on p21 in colon cancer. PLoS One 7, e39381 (2012).
  3. U. A. Hänninen et al., Exome-wide somatic mutation characterization of small bowel adenocarcinoma. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007200 (2018).
  4. C. Hodges, J. G. Kirkland, G. R. Crabtree, The many roles of BAF (mSWI/SNF) and PBAF complexes in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, a026930 (2016).
  5. J. J. Staudacher et al., Activin signaling is an essential component of the TGF-β in- duced pro-metastatic phenotype in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 5569 (2017).

Authors
Takeda, H., Kataoka, S., Nakayama, M., Ali, M. A. E., Oshima, H., Yamamoto, D., Park, J.-W., Takegami, Y., An, T., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., & Oshima, M.
Affiliations
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • Dnaform (Japan) (JP)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-07-12
Volume
116
Issue
31
Pages
15635-15644
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2959016616
Cited by
172
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Molecular Biology Society of Japan
Funders
  • Naito Foundation
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
colorectal cancer, driver genes, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, functional validation, activin receptors, TGF-beta, ACVR1B, ACVR2A, ARID2, tumor suppressor
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Organoids, Colorectal Neoplasms, Mice, Inbred NOD, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Gene Knockout Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review