Cited by 110Photochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesChemical Reactions and MechanismsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Excited-state proton transfer relieves antiaromaticity in molecules

Open access
Wu, Chia-Hua, Karas, Lucas José, Ottosson, Henrik, Wu, Judy I-Chia·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: Excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) is universally recognized as a reaction that relaxes the energy of a photoexcited organic compound. It is commonly found in many light-driven processes. Here we identify decisive principles underlying why and when ESPT happens. Our computational investigation of prototypical ESPT reactions finds that the occurrence of ESPT can be explained by an electron-counting rule—Baird’s rule, which remains largely ignored despite having a near–50-y-old history. We emphasize that this surprising connection not only explains the mechanistic principle of ESPT reactions, but it also predicts whether hydrogen bonding interactions that form within and between organic compounds might strengthen or weaken when irradiated by light. Recognizing this relationship has tremendous interpretive merit for organic photochemistry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1908516116

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept of ESA and ESAA was used to show that light-driven proton transfer reactions happen due to ESAA relief.

    “The concept of excited-state aromaticity (ESA) and excited-state antiaromaticity (ESAA) was used to show that the light-driven proton transfer reactions happen due to ESAA relief [198,199].”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [198]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C.-H., Karas, L. J., Ottosson, H., & Wu, J. I.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-09-25
Volume
116
Issue
41
Pages
20303-20308
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2977234488
Cited by
110
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CHE-1751370, MRI-1531814)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2015-04538)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
excited-state proton transfer, antiaromaticity, Baird's rule, electron counting, hydrogen bonding, organic photochemistry, photoexcited molecules, reaction mechanism
MeSH terms
Electrons, Hydroxyquinolines, Models, Molecular, Protons, Quantum Theory, Molecular Structure, Salicylic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review