Cited by 858Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesCoastal and Marine Management

Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status

Open access
Hilborn, Ray, Amoroso, Ricardo Oscar, Anderson, Christopher M., Baum, Julia K., Branch, Trevor A., Costello, Christopher, de Moor, Carryn L., Faraj, Abdelmalek +15 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Marine fish stocks are an important part of the world food system and are particularly important for many of the poorest people of the world. Most existing analyses suggest overfishing is increasing, and there is widespread concern that fish stocks are decreasing throughout most of the world. We assembled trends in abundance and harvest rate of stocks that are scientifically assessed, constituting half of the reported global marine fish catch. For these stocks, on average, abundance is increasing and is at proposed target levels. Compared with regions that are intensively managed, regions with less-developed fisheries management have, on average, 3-fold greater harvest rates and half the abundance as assessed stocks. Available evidence suggests that the regions without assessments of abundance have little fisheries management, and stocks are in poor shape. Increased application of area-appropriate fisheries science recommendations and management tools are still needed for sustaining fisheries in places where they are lacking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1909726116

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Ludwig D., Hilborn R., Walters C., Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from history. Science 260, 17– 36 (1993). 17793516
  2. [2]Sætersdal G., A review of past management of some pelagic stocks and its effectiveness. Rapp. P. V. Reun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 177, 505– 512 (1980).
  3. [3]Dickey-Collas M., Lessons learned from stock collapse and recovery of North Sea herring: A review. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 67, 1875– 1886 (2010).
  4. [10]Neubauer P., Jensen O. P., Hutchings J. A., Baum J. K., Resilience and recovery of overexploited marine populations. Science 340, 347– 349 (2013). 23599493
  5. [11]Melnychuk M. C., Peterson E., Elliott M., Hilborn R., Fisheries management impacts on target species status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 178– 183 (2017). 27994155 PMC5224377
  6. [13]Beverton R. J. H., Holt S. J., On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations (Chapman and Hall, London, 1957), pp. 533.
  7. [14]Ricker W. E., Handbook of Computations for Biological Statistics of Fish Populations (Queen’s Printer and Controller of Stationary, Ottawa, 1958), pp. 300.
  8. [16]Vert-pre K. A., Amoroso R. O., Jensen O. P., Hilborn R., Frequency and intensity of productivity regime shifts in marine fish stocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1779– 1784 (2013). 23322735 PMC3562848
  9. [17]Neubauer P., Thorson J. T., Melnychuk M. C., Methot R., Blackhart K., Drivers and rates of stock assessments in the United States. PLoS One 13, e0196483 (2018). 29750789 PMC5947900
  10. [18]Rousseau Y., Watson R. A., Blanchard J. L., Fulton E. A., Evolution of global marine fishing fleets and the response of fished resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 12238– 12243 (2019). 31138680 PMC6589657
  11. [21]Hilborn R., Stewart I. J., Branch T. A., Jensen O. P., Defining trade-offs among conservation of species diversity abundances, profitability, and food security in the California Current bottom- trawl fishery. Conserv. Biol. 26, 257– 266 (2012). 22443131
  12. [22]Council N. R., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Fish Stock Rebuilding Plans in the United States (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2014).
  13. [26]Costello C., Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 5125– 5129 (2016). 27035953 PMC4983844
  14. [28]Anderson J. L., The fishery performance indicators: A management tool for triple bottom line outcomes. PLoS One 10, e0122809 (2015). 25946194 PMC4422616
  15. [30]Szuwalski C. S., Burgess M. G., Costello C., Gaines S. D., High fishery catches through trophic cascades in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 717– 721 (2017). 28028218 PMC5278447
  16. [32]Chuenpagdee R., “Too big to ignore: Global research network for the future of small-scale fisheries” in World Small-Scale Fisheries Contemporary Visions, Chuenpagdee R., Ed. (Eburon Academic Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2011), pp. 383– 394.
  17. [33]Arlinghaus R., Opinion: Governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 5209– 5213 (2019). 30890655 PMC6431172
  18. [34]Anderson C. M., How commercial fishing effort is managed. Fish Fish. 25, 333 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilborn, R., Amoroso, R. O., Anderson, C. M., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Costello, C., de Moor, C. L., Faraj, A., Hively, D., Jensen, O. P., Kurota, H., Little, L. R., Mace, P., McClanahan, T., Melnychuk, M. C., Minto, C., Osio, G. C., Parma, A. M., Pons, M., Segurado, S., Szuwalski, C. S., Wilson, J. R., & Ye, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa;
  • Institut National de Recherche Halieutique (MA)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency (JP)
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
  • Ministry for Primary Industries (NZ)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (IE)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Systems Division, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership, Honolulu, HI 96816;
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
Corresponding author
Hilborn, Ray
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-01-13
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
2218-2224
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2999917256
Cited by
858
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 54 · 2015: 1
FWCI
41.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • The Nature Conservancy (SNP012)
  • The Wildlife Conservation Society (SNP012)
  • Walton Family Foundation (66-0966)
  • Environmental Defense Fund (NA)
  • 12 Fishing Companies (68-0019)
  • Richard C and Lois M Worthington Endowed Professorship in Fisheries Management (65-2871)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
fisheries management, fish stock status, fish abundance, exploitation rate, overfishing, fish stock assessment, marine fish stocks, sustainable fisheries
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fisheries, Fishes, Food Supply, Humans, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review