The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Open accessAbstract
To elucidate the nature of plant response to infection and transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens , we compared the cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) pattern of Agrobacterium - and mock-inoculated Ageratum conyzoides plant cell cultures. From 16,000 cDNA fragments analyzed, 251 (1.6%) were differentially regulated (0.5% down-regulated) 48 h after cocultivation with Agrobacterium . From 75 strongly regulated fragments, 56 were already regulated 24 h after cocultivation. Sequence similarities were obtained for 20 of these fragments, and reverse transcription–PCR analysis was carried out with seven to confirm their cDNA-AFLP differential pattern. Their sequence similarities suggest a role for these genes in signal perception, transduction, and plant defense. Reverse transcription–PCR analysis indicated that four genes involved in defense response are regulated in a similar manner by nonpathogenic bacteria, whereas one gene putatively involved in signal transduction appeared to respond more strongly to Agrobacterium . A nodulin-like gene was regulated only by Agrobacterium . These results demonstrate a rapid plant cell response to Agrobacterium infection, which overlaps a general response to bacteria but also has Agrobacterium -specific features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes
Broughton, W. J., Hernández, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., & Vanderleyden, J. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024146710611 · Cited by 1,511
Agrobacterium -Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool
Gelvin, S. B. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Madlung, A., Masuelli, R. W., Watson, B., Reynolds, S. H., Davison, J., & Comai, L. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.003095 · Cited by 401
Self-citationCraciun, A. R. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl062 · Cited by 51
Sojikul, P., Kongsawadworakul, P., Viboonjun, U., Thaiprasit, J., Intawong, B., Narangajavana, J., & Svasti, M. R. J. (2010) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01389.x · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Ditt, R. F., Nester, E. W., & Comai, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-09-04
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10954-10959
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2017559931
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.191383498
- The paper
- Ditt, R. F., Nester, E. W., & Comai, L. (2001). Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191383498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.