Cited by 23Gene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

A hierarchical Bayesian mixture model for inferring the expression state of genes in transcriptomes

Open access
Thompson, Ammon, May, Michael R., Moore, Brian R., Kopp, Artyom·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: How do the cells of an organism—each with an identical genome—give rise to tissues of incredible phenotypic diversity? Key to answering this question is the transcriptome: the set of genes expressed in a given tissue. We would clearly benefit from the ability to identify qualitative differences in expression (whether a gene is active or inactive in a given tissue/species). Inferring the expression state of genes is surprisingly difficult, owing to the complex biological processes that give rise to transcriptomes and to the vagaries of techniques used to generate transcriptomic datasets. We develop a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model that—by describing those biological and technical processes—allows us to infer the expression state of genes from replicate transcriptomic datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1919748117

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, A., May, M. R., Moore, B. R., & Kopp, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Ammon
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-07-24
Volume
117
Issue
32
Pages
19339-19346
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3044106870
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (5F32GM125107-02, R35GM122592)
  • National Science Foundation (DEB-0842181, DEB-0919529, DBI-1356737)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
transcriptome, RNA-seq, gene activity, genotype-phenotype correlation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Primates, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review