The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species
Open accessAbstract
In this article we briefly review theories about the ecological roles of microbial secondary metabolites and discuss the prevalence of multiple secondary metabolite production by strains of Streptomyces , highlighting results from analysis of the recently sequenced Streptomyces coelicolor and Streptomyces avermitilis genomes. We address this question: Why is multiple secondary metabolite production in Streptomyces species so commonplace? We argue that synergy or contingency in the action of individual metabolites against biological competitors may, in some cases, be a powerful driving force for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production. This argument is illustrated with examples of the coproduction of synergistically acting antibiotics and contingently acting siderophores: two well-known classes of secondary metabolite. We focus, in particular, on the coproduction of β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors, the coproduction of type A and type B streptogramins, and the coregulated production and independent uptake of structurally distinct siderophores by species of Streptomyces . Possible mechanisms for the evolution of multiple synergistic and contingent metabolite production in Streptomyces species are discussed. It is concluded that the production by Streptomyces species of two or more secondary metabolites that act synergistically or contingently against biological competitors may be far more common than has previously been recognized, and that synergy and contingency may be common driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by these sessile saprophytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century
Tyers, M., & Wright, G. D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0141-x · Cited by 820
Koumoutsi, A., Chen, X.-H., Henne, A., Liesegang, H., Hitzeroth, G., Franke, P., Vater, J., & Borriss, R. (2004) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.186.4.1084-1096.2004 · Cited by 632
Combinatorial biosynthesis of reduced polyketides
Weissman, K. J., & Leadlay, P. F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1287 · Cited by 466
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., et al. (2021) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6377 · Cited by 445
Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme?
Seipke, R. F., Kaltenpoth, M., & Hutchings, M. I. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Challis, G. L., & Hopwood, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-11-25
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- 14555-14561
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2008343440
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1934677100
- The paper
- Challis, G. L., & Hopwood, D. A. (2003). Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934677100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.