The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systemic signaling during abiotic stress combination in plants
Open accessAbstract
Extreme environmental conditions, such as heat, salinity, and decreased water availability, can have a devastating impact on plant growth and productivity, potentially resulting in the collapse of entire ecosystems. Stress-induced systemic signaling and systemic acquired acclimation play canonical roles in plant survival during episodes of environmental stress. Recent studies revealed that in response to a single abiotic stress, applied to a single leaf, plants mount a comprehensive stress-specific systemic response that includes the accumulation of many different stress-specific transcripts and metabolites, as well as a coordinated stress-specific whole-plant stomatal response. However, in nature plants are routinely subjected to a combination of two or more different abiotic stresses, each potentially triggering its own stress-specific systemic response, highlighting a new fundamental question in plant biology: are plants capable of integrating two different systemic signals simultaneously generated during conditions of stress combination? Here we show that plants can integrate two different systemic signals simultaneously generated during stress combination, and that the manner in which plants sense the different stresses that trigger these signals (i.e., at the same or different parts of the plant) makes a significant difference in how fast and efficient they induce systemic reactive oxygen species (ROS) signals; transcriptomic, hormonal, and stomatal responses; as well as plant acclimation. Our results shed light on how plants acclimate to their environment and survive a combination of different abiotic stresses. In addition, they highlight a key role for systemic ROS signals in coordinating the response of different leaves to stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses
Mittler, R., Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., & Van Breusegem, F. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2 · Cited by 2,351
Self-citationZandalinas, S. I., Fritschi, F. B., & Mittler, R. (2021) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationDeveloping climate‐resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination
Rivero, R. M., Mittler, R., Blumwald, E., & Zandalinas, S. I. (2022) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15483 · Cited by 622
Self-citationPlant responses to multifactorial stress combination
Zandalinas, S. I., & Mittler, R. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.18087 · Cited by 499
Self-citationSignaling Toward Reactive Oxygen Species-Scavenging Enzymes in Plants
Dvořák, P., Krasylenko, Y., Zeiner, A., Šamaj, J., & Takáč, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.618835 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., Devireddy, A. R., Sengupta, S., Azad, R. K., & Mittler, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2020-05-29
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13810-13820
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W3032143849
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systemic signaling during abiotic stress combination in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2005077117
- The paper
- Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., Devireddy, A. R., Sengupta, S., Azad, R. K., & Mittler, R. (2020). Systemic signaling during abiotic stress combination in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005077117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.