Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services

Open access
Felipe-Lucia, María R., Soliveres, Santiago, Penone, Caterina, Fischer, Markus, Ammer, Christian, Boch, Steffen, Boeddinghaus, Runa S., Bonkowski, Michael, Buscot, François, Fiore-Donno, Anna Maria, Frank, Kevin, Goldmann, Kezia, Gossner, Martin M., Hölzel, Norbert, Jochum, Malte, Kandeler, Ellen, Klaus, Valentin H., Kleinebecker, Till, Leimer, Sophia, Manning, Peter, Oelmann, Yvonne, Saiz, Hugo, Schall, Peter, Schloter, Michael, Schöning, Ingo, Schrumpf, Marion, Solly, Emily F., Stempfhuber, Barbara, Weisser, Wolfgang W., Wilcke, Wolfgang, Wubet, Tesfaye, Allan, Eric·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Ecosystem services derive from ecosystem functions and rely on complex interactions among a diversity of organisms. By understanding the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and the services humans receive from nature, we can anticipate how changes in land use will affect ecosystems and human wellbeing. We show that increasing land-use intensity homogenizes the synergies between three organizational levels of the ecosystem, namely, biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Increasing land-use intensity changes keystone components, which are important for the functioning of the ecosystem, and alters the synergies and trade-offs between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Our approach provides a comprehensive view of ecosystem functioning and can identify the key ecosystem attributes to monitor in order to prevent critical shifts in ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2016210117

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Soliveres, S., Penone, C., Fischer, M., Ammer, C., Boch, S., Boeddinghaus, R. S., Bonkowski, M., Buscot, F., Fiore-Donno, A. M., Frank, K., Goldmann, K., Gossner, M. M., Hölzel, N., Jochum, M., Kandeler, E., Klaus, V. H., Kleinebecker, T., Leimer, S., Manning, P., Oelmann, Y., Saiz, H., Schall, P., Schloter, M., Schöning, I., Schrumpf, M., Solly, E. F., Stempfhuber, B., Weisser, W. W., Wilcke, W., Wubet, T., & Allan, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
117
Issue
45
Pages
28140-28149
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3094319426
Cited by
432
References
64
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2016210117
The paper
Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Soliveres, S., Penone, C., Fischer, M., Ammer, C., Boch, S., Boeddinghaus, R. S., Bonkowski, M., Buscot, F., Fiore-Donno, A. M., Frank, K., Goldmann, K., Gossner, M. M., Hölzel, N., Jochum, M., Kandeler, E., Klaus, V. H., Kleinebecker, T., Leimer, S., . . . Allan, E. (2020). Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016210117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.