Cited by 31RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Shape changes and cooperativity in the folding of the central domain of the 16S ribosomal RNA

Open access
Hori, Naoto, Denesyuk, Natalia A., Thirumalai, D.·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: Ribosomes are complexes between ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and a number of proteins. Because ribosome assembly begins with rRNA folding, we simulated the molecular details of Mg 2+ -driven folding of the central domain of the bacterial rRNA. Good agreement with experiments on the folding of the three-way junction in the center of the rRNA validates the model. Coupling of rRNA folding and Mg 2+ binding shows that ions interact with rRNA segments in a coordinated manner. The shape of rRNA changes from a sphere in the unfolded state to a prolate ellipsoid at high Mg 2+ concentration, which is the opposite of what transpires when a globular protein folds. Our study provides the needed framework for undertaking ion-driven folding of large RNA molecules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2020837118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The changes added by human players tend to agree with the 16S structural model, especially in regions linked to important functional sites, such as S8 and S15 binding sites, and a region that undergoes conformational readjustment during 30S assembly.

    “In Fig. 4, we show that the changes added by human players tend to agree with the 16S structural model, especially in regions linked to important functional sites, such as S8 and S15 binding sites, and a region that undergoes conformational readjustment during 30S assembly44–49.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 31

Authors
Hori, N., Denesyuk, N. A., & Thirumalai, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Thirumalai, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-03-03
Volume
118
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3135083938
Cited by
31
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CHE 19-00093)
  • Welch Foundation (F-0019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
16S rRNA, rRNA folding, magnesium binding, three-way junction, cooperativity, ribosome assembly, RNA conformational change
MeSH terms
Magnesium, Models, Chemical, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, RNA Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review