The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation
Open accessAbstract
Epigenetic silencing associated with aberrant methylation of promoter region CpG islands is one mechanism leading to loss of tumor suppressor function in human cancer. Profiling of CpG island methylation indicates that some genes are more frequently methylated than others, and that each tumor type is associated with a unique set of methylated genes. However, little is known about why certain genes succumb to this aberrant event. To address this question, we used Restriction Landmark Genome Scanning to analyze the susceptibility of 1,749 unselected CpG islands to de novo methylation driven by overexpression of DNA cytosine-5-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). We found that although the overall incidence of CpG island methylation was increased in cells overexpressing DNMT1, not all loci were equally affected. The majority of CpG islands (69.9%) were resistant to de novo methylation, regardless of DNMT1 overexpression. In contrast, we identified a subset of methylation-prone CpG islands (3.8%) that were consistently hypermethylated in multiple DNMT1 overexpressing clones. Methylation-prone and methylation-resistant CpG islands were not significantly different with respect to size, C+G content, CpG frequency, chromosomal location, or promoter association. We used DNA pattern recognition and supervised learning techniques to derive a classification function based on the frequency of seven novel sequence patterns that was capable of discriminating methylation-prone from methylation-resistant CpG islands with 82% accuracy. The data indicate that CpG islands differ in their intrinsic susceptibility to de novo methylation, and suggest that the propensity for a CpG island to become aberrantly methylated can be predicted based on its sequence context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
Cited by
Schlesinger, Y., Straussman, R., Keshet, I., Farkash, S., Hecht, M., Zimmerman, J., Eden, E., Yakhini, Z., Ben-Shushan, E., Reubinoff, B. E., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1950 · Cited by 1,226
R-Loop Formation Is a Distinctive Characteristic of Unmethylated Human CpG Island Promoters
Ginno, P. A., Lott, P. L., Christensen, H. C., Korf, I., & Chédin, F. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.017 · Cited by 910
DNA hypomethylation and human diseases
Wilson, A. S., Power, B. E., & Molloy, P. L. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.007 · Cited by 804
Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences
Eden, E., Lipson, D., Yogev, S., & Yakhini, Z. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030039 · Cited by 696
Park, J. H., Stoffers, D. A., Nicholls, R. D., & Simmons, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci33655 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Feltus, F. A., Lee, E. K., Costello, J. F., Plass, C., & Vertino, P. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-09-30
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 12253-12258
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126263355
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2037852100
- The paper
- Feltus, F. A., Lee, E. K., Costello, J. F., Plass, C., & Vertino, P. M. (2003). Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2037852100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.