The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish
Open accessAbstract
Although sexual selection theory has proved successful in explaining a wide array of male ornaments, the function of ornaments occurring in females is largely unknown. Traditionally, female ornaments have been considered nonfunctional, being merely a genetically correlated response to selection for male ornamentation. However, this hypothesis is only relevant to species in which the ornament is basically the same in the two sexes. Alternatively, female ornaments may be influenced by selection acting directly on the females, either through female–female competition or male choice. We tested the latter hypothesis in mate-choice experiments with two-spotted gobies ( Gobiusculus flavescens ). In this small marine fish, females have bright yellow-orange bellies during the breeding season, a conspicuous trait that is not present in males. We conducted two aquarium experiments to test whether males preferred to mate with more colorful females. In the first experiment, males had a choice between two females that varied in natural coloration (and belly roundness). In the second experiment, we manipulated belly coloration and kept roundness constant. Males spent more time with colorful than with drab females in both experiments and also performed far more courtship displays toward colorful females. Our study provides experimental evidence that males prefer ornamented females in a fish that is not sex-role reversed, supporting the hypothesis that female ornamentation is sexually selected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.327542 · Cited by 6,230
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS
Lande, R. (1980) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04817.x · Cited by 1,878
Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/413215 · Cited by 1,693
Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives
Bradbury, J. W. (1987) · Cited by 1,069
Good genes, oxidative stress and condition–dependent sexual signals
Schantz, T. V., Bensch, S., Grahn, M., Hasselquist, D., & Wittzell, H. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0597 · Cited by 886
Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males
Milinski, M., & Bakker, T. C. M. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344330a0 · Cited by 861
Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality
Hill, G. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350337a0 · Cited by 837
Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required?
Olson, V. A., & Owens, I. P. F. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01484-0 · Cited by 816
Why are female birds ornamented?
Amundsen, T. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01800-5 · Cited by 703
Self-citation
Cited by
The evolution of mutual ornamentation
Kraaijeveld, K., Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. J. L., & Komdeur, J. (2007) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027 · Cited by 395
Fan, X., Zheng, X., An, T., Li, X., Leung, N., Zhu, B., Sui, T., Shi, N., Fan, T., & Zhao, Q. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2219300120 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Amundsen, T., & Forsgren, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-10-16
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13155-13160
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2061702243
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.211439298
- The paper
- Amundsen, T., & Forsgren, E. (2001). Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211439298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.