Cited by 114Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

Development of a universal nanobody-binding Fab module for fiducial-assisted cryo-EM studies of membrane proteins

Open access
Bloch, Joël S., Mukherjee, Somnath, Kowal, Julia, Filippova, Ekaterina V., Niederer, Martina, Pardon, Els, Steyaert, Jan, Kossiakoff, Anthony A. +1 more·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: Structural studies of membrane proteins by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) often require antibody fragments (Fabs) to facilitate particle alignments and achieve high resolution. While conformational nanobodies have been developed to lock specific states of many membrane proteins, they only add 15 kDa of mass to the complex. We developed a synthetic Fab (NabFab) that rigidly binds the conserved scaffold of nanobodies, providing a universally applicable fiducial for cryo-EM studies of protein–nanobody complexes. We demonstrate the concept by determining two high-resolution structures of membrane proteins bound to specific nanobodies and NabFab. As the structural epitope for NabFab can be incorporated into the scaffold of virtually any nanobody, this raises the prospect of facile structure determination of many nanobody–protein complexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2115435118

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloch, J. S., Mukherjee, S., Kowal, J., Filippova, E. V., Niederer, M., Pardon, E., Steyaert, J., Kossiakoff, A. A., & Locher, K. P.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
118
Issue
47
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3211372884
Cited by
114
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_189111)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (GM117372)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
nanobodies, fiducial markers, membrane proteins, high-resolution structure determination
MeSH terms
Animals, Camelids, New World, Camelus, Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Sequence Alignment, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review