The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of the genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana shows that this genome, like that of many other eukaryotic organisms, has undergone large-scale gene duplications or even duplications of the entire genome. However, the high frequency of gene loss after duplication events reduces colinearity and therefore the chance of finding duplicated regions that, at the extreme, no longer share homologous genes. In this study we show that heavily degenerated block duplications that can no longer be recognized by directly comparing two segments because of differential gene loss, can still be detected through indirect comparison with other segments. When these so-called hidden duplications in Arabidopsis are taken into account, many homologous genomic regions can be found in five to eight copies. This finding strongly implies that Arabidopsis has undergone three, but probably no more, rounds of genome duplications. Therefore, adding such hidden blocks to the duplication landscape of Arabidopsis sheds light on the number of polyploidy events that this model plant genome has undergone in its evolutionary past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution
McLysaght, A., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng884 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Cannon, S. B., Mitra, A., Baumgarten, A., Young, N. D., & May, G. (2004) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-4-10 · Cited by 2,372
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes
Schranz, M. E., Lysak, M. A., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · Cited by 575
Genome-Wide Analysis of the GRAS Gene Family in Rice and Arabidopsis
Tian, C., Wan, P., Sun, S., Li, J., & Chen, M. (2004) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/b:plan.0000038256.89809.57 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Zabeau, M., & Van de Peer, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-10-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 13627-13632
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2101343618
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.212522399
- The paper
- Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Zabeau, M., & Van de Peer, Y. (2002). The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.212522399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.