The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks
Open accessAbstract
Interpreting data from large-scale protein interaction experiments has been a challenging task because of the widespread presence of random false positives. Here, we present a network-based statistical algorithm that overcomes this difficulty and allows us to derive functions of unannotated proteins from large-scale interaction data. Our algorithm uses the insight that if two proteins share significantly larger number of common interaction partners than random, they have close functional associations. Analysis of publicly available data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals >2,800 reliable functional associations, 29% of which involve at least one unannotated protein. By further analyzing these associations, we derive tentative functions for 81 unannotated proteins with high certainty. Our method is not overly sensitive to the false positives present in the data. Even after adding 50% randomly generated interactions to the measured data set, we are able to recover almost all (≈89%) of the original associations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips
Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, P., Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062191 · Cited by 1,884
Cited by
Systems approach to explore components and interactions in the presynapse
Abul‐Husn, N. S., Bushlin, I., Morón, J. A., Jenkins, S. L., Dolios, G., Wang, R., Iyengar, R., Ma'ayan, A., & Devi, L. A. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800767 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Samanta, M. P., & Liang, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-10-17
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12579-12583
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2171692650
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2132527100
- The paper
- Samanta, M. P., & Liang, S. (2003). Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2132527100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.