The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs
Open accessAbstract
Aposematism is the association, in a prey organism, of the presence of a warning signal with unprofitability to predators. The origin of aposematism is puzzling, because of its predicted low probability of establishment in a population due to the prey's increased conspicuousness. Aposematism is a widespread trait in invertebrate taxa, but, in vertebrates, it is mostly evident in amphibians, reptiles, and fishes. Poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are one of the most well known examples of the co-occurrence of warning coloration and toxicity. This monophyletic group of mostly diurnal leaf-litter Neotropical anurans has both toxic/colorful and palatable/cryptic species. Previous studies suggested a single origin of toxicity and warning coloration, dividing the family in two discrete groups of primitively cryptic and more derived aposematic frogs. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses using mostly aposematic taxa supported this conclusion and proposed a single tandem origin of toxicity and conspicuous warning coloration. By using expanded taxon and character sampling, we reexamined the phylogenetic correlation between the origins of toxicity and warning coloration. At least four or five independent origins of aposematism have occurred within poison frogs; by using simulations, we rejected hypotheses of one, two, or three origins of aposematism ( P < 0.002). We also found that diet specialization is linked with the evolution of aposematism. Specialization on prey, such as ants and termites, may have evolved independently at least two times.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Sequestration of Defensive Substances from Plants by Lepidoptera
Nishida, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145121 · Cited by 652
Cited by
FROST, D. R., GRANT, T., FAIVOVICH, J., BAIN, R. H., HAAS, A., HADDAD, C. F. B., DE SÁ, R. O., CHANNING, A., WILKINSON, M., DONNELLAN, S. C., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History · doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:tatol]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,922
Amazonian Amphibian Diversity Is Primarily Derived from Late Miocene Andean Lineages
Santos, J. C., Coloma, L. A., Summers, K., Caldwell, J. P., Ree, R., & Cannatella, D. C. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000056 · Cited by 349
Self-citationBinding and sequestration of poison frog alkaloids by a plasma globulin
Alvarez-Buylla, A., Fischer, M.-T., Moya Garzon, M. D., Rangel, A. E., Tapia, E. E., Tanzo, J. T., Soh, H. T., Coloma, L. A., Long, J. Z., & O'Connell, L. A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85096 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, J. C., Coloma, L. A., & Cannatella, D. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-10-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12792-12797
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2159951266
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2133521100
- The paper
- Santos, J. C., Coloma, L. A., & Cannatella, D. C. (2003). Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2133521100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.