The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny
Open accessAbstract
Plant phylogenetic estimates are most likely to be reliable when congruent evidence is obtained independently from the mitochondrial, plastid, and nuclear genomes with all methods of analysis. Here, results are presented from separate and combined genomic analyses of new and previously published data, including six and nine genes (8,911 bp and 12,010 bp, respectively) for different subsets of taxa that suggest Amborella+ Nymphaeales (water lilies) are the first-branching angiosperm lineage. Before and after tree-independent noise reduction, most individual genomic compartments and methods of analysis estimated the Amborella+ Nymphaeales basal topology with high support. Previous phylogenetic estimates placing Amborella alone as the first extant angiosperm branch may have been misled because of a series of specific problems with paralogy, suboptimal outgroups, long-branch taxa, and method dependence. Ancestral character state reconstructions differ between the two topologies and affect inferences about the features of early angiosperms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading.
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412923 · Cited by 2,230
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS IN MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS
Nei, M. (1996) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.371 · Cited by 349
Cited by
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/boj.12385 · Cited by 9,555
Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1603 · Cited by 1,236
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Becker, A. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00207-0 · Cited by 990
Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants
Bergthorsson, U., Adams, K. L., Thomason, B., & Palmer, J. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01743 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Barkman, T. J., Chenery, G., McNeal, J. R., Lyons-Weiler, J., Ellisens, W. J., Moore, G., Wolfe, A. D., & dePamphilis, C. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-11-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13166-13171
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2130873484
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.220427497
- The paper
- Barkman, T. J., Chenery, G., McNeal, J. R., Lyons-Weiler, J., Ellisens, W. J., Moore, G., Wolfe, A. D., & dePamphilis, C. W. (2000). Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220427497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.