Cited by 21Protein Structure and DynamicsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

A generic framework for hierarchical de novo protein design

Open access
Harteveld, Zander, Bonet, Jaume, Rosset, Stéphane, Yang, Che, Sesterhenn, Fabian, Correia, Bruno E.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

De novo protein design enables the exploration of novel sequences and structures absent from the natural protein universe. De novo design also stands as a stringent test for our understanding of the underlying physical principles of protein folding and may lead to the development of proteins with unmatched functional characteristics. The first fundamental challenge of de novo design is to devise “designable” structural templates leading to sequences that will adopt the predicted fold. Here, we built on the TopoBuilder (TB) de novo design method, to automatically assemble structural templates with native-like features starting from string descriptors that capture the overall topology of proteins. Our framework eliminates the dependency of hand-crafted and fold-specific rules through an iterative, data-driven approach that extracts geometrical parameters from structural tertiary motifs. We evaluated the TopoBuilder framework by designing sequences for a set of five protein folds and experimental characterization revealed that several sequences were folded and stable in solution. The TopoBuilder de novo design framework will be broadly useful to guide the generation of artificial proteins with customized geometries, enabling the exploration of the protein universe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2206111119

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Harteveld, Z., Bonet, J., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Sesterhenn, F., & Correia, B. E.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Correia, Bruno E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
119
Issue
43
Pages
e2206111119-e2206111119
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4306641699
Cited by
21
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Biltema Foundation
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico
  • National Supercomputing Centre Singapore
  • H2020 European Research Council (716058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
de novo protein design, structural templates, protein topology, geometric parameters, protein folding, artificial proteins, protein stability
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review