The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project normal: Defining normal variance in mouse gene expression
Open accessAbstract
The mouse has become an indispensable and versatile model organism for the study of development, genetics, behavior, and disease. The application of comprehensive gene expression profiling technologies to compare normal and diseased tissues or to assess molecular alterations resulting from various experimental interventions has the potential to provide highly detailed qualitative and quantitative descriptions of these processes. Ideally, to interpret experimental data, the magnitude and diversity of gene expression for the system under study should be well characterized, yet little is known about the normal variation of mouse gene expression in vivo. To assess natural differences in murine gene expression, we used a 5406-clone spotted cDNA microarray to quantitate transcript levels in the kidney, liver, and testis from each of 6 normal male C57BL6 mice. We used ANOVA to compare the variance across the six mice to the variance among four replicate experiments performed for each mouse tissue. For the 6 kidney samples, 102 of 3,088 genes (3.3%) exhibited a statistically significant mouse variance at a level of 0.05. In the testis, 62 of 3,252 genes (1.9%) showed statistically significant variance, and in the liver, there were 21 of 2,514 (0.8%) genes with significantly variable expression. Immune-modulated, stress-induced, and hormonally regulated genes were highly represented among the transcripts that were most variable. The expression levels of several genes varied significantly in more than one tissue. These studies help to define the baseline level of variability in mouse gene expression and emphasize the importance of replicate microarray experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene expression profile of aging and its retardation by caloric restriction
Lee, C.-K., Klopp, R. G., Weindruch, R., & Prolla, T. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5432.1390 · Cited by 1,473
SOCS: physiological suppressors of cytokine signaling
Krebs, D. L., & Hilton, D. J. (2000) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.113.16.2813 · Cited by 463
Cited by
Wang, S., Gao, J., Lei, Q., Rozengurt, N., Pritchard, C., Jiao, J., Thomas, G. V., Li, G., Roy-Burman, P., Nelson, P. S., et al. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00215-0 · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationFundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays
Churchill, G. A. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1031 · Cited by 1,050
Intra- and Interspecific Variation in Primate Gene Expression Patterns
Enard, W., Khaitovich, P., Klose, J., Zöllner, S., Heissig, F., Giavalisco, P., Nieselt-Struwe, K., Muchmore, E., Varki, A., Ravid, R., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068996 · Cited by 845
Genomic Analysis of Mouse Retinal Development
Blackshaw, S., Harpavat, S., Trimarchi, J., Cai, L., Huang, H., Kuo, W. P., Weber, G., Lee, K., Fraioli, R. E., Cho, S.-H., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020247 · Cited by 585
Mostaghel, E. A., Page, S. T., Lin, D. W., Fazli, L., Coleman, I. M., True, L. D., Knudsen, B., Hess, D. L., Nelson, C. C., Matsumoto, A. M., et al. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3332 · Cited by 529
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pritchard, C. C., Hsu, L., Delrow, J., & Nelson, P. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-11-06
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13266-13271
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2144055687
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Project normal: Defining normal variance in mouse gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.221465998
- The paper
- Pritchard, C. C., Hsu, L., Delrow, J., & Nelson, P. S. (2001). Project normal: Defining normal variance in mouse gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.221465998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.