The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
The insect chemoreceptor superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster is predicted to consist of 62 odorant receptor (Or) and 68 gustatory receptor (Gr) proteins, encoded by families of 60 Or and 60 Gr genes through alternative splicing. We include two previously undescribed Or genes and two previously undescribed Gr genes; two previously predicted Or genes are shown to be alternative splice forms. Three polymorphic pseudogenes and one highly defective pseudogene are recognized. Phylogenetic analysis reveals deep branches connecting multiple highly divergent clades within the Gr family, and the Or family appears to be a single highly expanded lineage within the superfamily. The genes are spread throughout the Drosophila genome, with some relatively recently diverged genes still clustered in the genome. The Gr5a gene on the X chromosome, which encodes a receptor for the sugar trehalose, has transposed from one such tandem cluster of six genes at cytological location 64, as has Gr61a , and all eight of these receptors might bind sugars. Analysis of intron evolution suggests that the common ancestor consisted of a long N-terminal exon encoding transmembrane domains 1-5 followed by three exons encoding transmembrane domains 6-7. As many as 57 additional introns have been acquired idiosyncratically during the evolution of the superfamily, whereas the ancestral introns and some of the older idiosyncratic introns have been lost at least 48 times independently. Altogether, these patterns of molecular evolution suggest that this is an ancient superfamily of chemoreceptors, probably dating back at least to the origin of the arthropods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
A Novel Family of Divergent Seven-Transmembrane Proteins
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Freeman, M. R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., & Carlson, J. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationA Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila
Dahanukar, A., Foster, K., van der Goes van Naters, W. M., & Carlson, J. R. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn765 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Cited by
Coding of Odors by a Receptor Repertoire
Hallem, E. A., & Carlson, J. R. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.050 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationThe Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Antenna
Hallem, E. A., Ho, M. G., & Carlson, J. R. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.012 · Cited by 991
Self-citationChittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.023 · Cited by 598
Liman, E. R., Zhang, Y. V., & Montell, C. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.022 · Cited by 473
Odor Coding in the Maxillary Palp of the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae
Lu, T., Qiu, Y. T., Wang, G., Kwon, J. Y., Rutzler, M., Kwon, H.-W., Pitts, R. J., van Loon, J. J. A., Takken, W., Carlson, J. R., et al. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.062 · Cited by 371
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, H. M., Warr, C. G., & Carlson, J. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-11-25
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- 14537-14542
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005111341
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2335847100
- The paper
- Robertson, H. M., Warr, C. G., & Carlson, J. R. (2003). Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2335847100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.