The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting the local dynamics of epizootic rabies among raccoons in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Mathematical models have been developed to explore the population dynamics of viral diseases among wildlife. However, assessing the predictions stemming from these models with wildlife databases adequate in size and temporal duration is uncommon. An epizootic of raccoon rabies that began in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States in the late 1970s has developed into one of the largest and most extensive in the history of wildlife rabies. We analyzed the dynamics of local epizootics at the county level by examining a database spanning more than 20 years and including 35,387 rabid raccoons. The size, number, and periodicity of rabies epizootics among raccoons were compared with predictions derived from a susceptible, exposed, infectious, and recovered model of raccoon rabies [Coyne, J., Smith, G. & McAllister, F. E. (1989)Am. J. Vet. Res.50, 2148–2154]. After our methods for defining epizootics were applied to solutions of the model, the time series revealed recurrent epizootics in some counties, with a median first epizootic period of 48 months. Successive epizootics declined in size and the epizootic period progressively decreased. Our reanalysis of the model predicted the initial-epizootic period of 4–5 years, with a progressive dampening of epizootic size and progressive decrease in epizootic period. The best quantitative agreement between data and model assumed low levels of immunity (1–5%) within raccoon populations, suggesting that raccoons develop little or no rabies immune class. These results encourage the use of data obtained through wildlife surveillance in assessing and refining epidemic models for wildlife diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predicting the spatial dynamics of rabies epidemics on heterogeneous landscapes
Smith, D. L., Lucey, B., Waller, L. A., Childs, J. E., & Real, L. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.042400799 · Cited by 378
Self-citationKyle, C. J., Rico, Y., Castillo, S., Srithayakumar, V., Cullingham, C. I., White, B. N., & Pond, B. A. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12726 · Cited by 38
Srithayakumar, V., Castillo, S., Rosatte, R. C., & Kyle, C. J. (2011) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-010-0485-5 · Cited by 36
Castillo, S., Srithayakumar, V., Meunier, V., & Kyle, C. J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012066 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Childs, J. E., Curns, A. T., Dey, M. E., Real, L. A., Feinstein, L., Bjørnstad, O. N., & Krebs, J. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-11-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 13666-13671
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2133430791
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the local dynamics of epizootic rabies among raccoons in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.240326697
- The paper
- Childs, J. E., Curns, A. T., Dey, M. E., Real, L. A., Feinstein, L., Bjørnstad, O. N., & Krebs, J. W. (2000). Predicting the local dynamics of epizootic rabies among raccoons in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240326697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.