The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations
Open accessAbstract
Recombination is a key evolutionary process that shapes the architecture of genomes and the genetic structure of populations. Although many statistical methods are available for the detection of recombination from DNA sequences, their absolute and relative performance is still unknown. Here we evaluated the performance of 14 different recombination detection algorithms. We used the coalescent with recombination to simulate DNA sequences with different levels of recombination, genetic diversity, and rate variation among sites. Recombination detection methods were applied to these data sets, and whether they detected or not recombination was recorded. Different recombination methods showed distinct performance depending on the amount of recombination, genetic diversity, and rate variation among sites. The model of nucleotide substitution under which the data were generated did not seem to have a significant effect. Most methods increase power with more sequence divergence. In general, recombination detection methods seem to capture the presence of recombination, but they are not very powerful. Methods that use substitution patterns or incompatibility among sites were more powerful than methods based on phylogenetic incongruence. Most methods do not seem to infer more false positives than expected by chance. Especially depending on the amount of diversity in the data, different methods could be used to attain maximum power while minimizing false positives. Results shown here will provide some guidance in the selection of the most appropriate method/s for the analysis of the particular data at hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
A Simple and Robust Statistical Test for Detecting the Presence of Recombination
Bruen, T. C., Philippe, H., & Bryant, D. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048975 · Cited by 1,382
Inheritance and recombination of mitochondrial genomes in plants, fungi and animals
Barr, C. M., Neiman, M., & Taylor, D. R. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01492.x · Cited by 382
Cao, J., & Li, X. (2015) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-014-2215-y · Cited by 131
The Landscape of Recombination Events That Create Nonribosomal Peptide Diversity
Baunach, M., Chowdhury, S., Stallforth, P., & Dittmann, E. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab015 · Cited by 72
Tichkule, S., Cacciò, S. M., Robinson, G., Chalmers, R. M., Mueller, I., Emery-Corbin, S. J., Eibach, D., Tyler, K. M., van Oosterhout, C., & Jex, A. R. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac056 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-11-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13757-13762
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1973667633
- Cited by
- 1,502
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.241370698
- The paper
- Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (2001). Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241370698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.