Integrative spatiotemporal modeling of biomolecular processes: Application to the assembly of the nuclear pore complex
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Dynamic processes involving biomolecules are essential for the function of the cell. Here, we introduce an integrative method for computing models of these processes based on multiple heterogeneous sources of information, including time-resolved experimental data and physical models of dynamic processes. First, for each time point, a set of coarse models of compositional and structural heterogeneity is computed (heterogeneity models). Second, for each heterogeneity model, a set of static integrative structure models is computed (a snapshot model). Finally, these snapshot models are selected and connected into a series of trajectories that optimize the likelihood of both the snapshot models and transitions between them (a trajectory model). The method is demonstrated by application to the assembly process of the human nuclear pore complex in the context of the reforming nuclear envelope during mitotic cell division, based on live-cell correlated electron tomography, bulk fluorescence correlation spectroscopy–calibrated quantitative live imaging, and a structural model of the fully assembled nuclear pore complex. Modeling of the assembly process improves the model precision over static integrative structure modeling alone. The method is applicable to a wide range of time-dependent systems in cell biology and is available to the broader scientific community through an implementation in the open source Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) software.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Molecular Architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus
Yao, H., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, N., Xu, J., Sun, C., Zhang, J., Weng, T., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Ahdritz, G., Bouatta, N., Floristean, C., Kadyan, S., Xia, Q., Gerecke, W., O’Donnell, T. J., Berenberg, D., Fisk, I., Zanichelli, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z · Cited by 439 · see citing works
To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding
Lane, T. J., Shukla, D., Beauchamp, K. A., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2012.11.002 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores
Mosalaganti, S., Obarska-Kosinska, A., Siggel, M., Taniguchi, R., Turoňová, B., Zimmerli, C. E., Buczak, K., Schmidt, F. H., Margiotta, E., Mackmull, M.-T., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm9506 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Machine learning approaches for analyzing and enhancing molecular dynamics simulations
Wang, Y., Lamim Ribeiro, J. M., & Tiwary, P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.016 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Latham, A. P., Zhang, W., Tempkin, J. O. B., Otsuka, S., Ellenberg, J., & Sali, A.
- Affiliations
- QB3 (US)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (ES)
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-03-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e2415674122-e2415674122
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC11929490
- OpenAlex
- W4408442362
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Baden-Württemberg Stiftung (N/A)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (N/A)
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083960, P41GM109824, R01GM112108, F32GM150243)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory Interdisciplinary Postdoc Programme (N/A)
- MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (N/A)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 511488495 - SFB 1638 P06)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- nuclear pore complex assembly, mitosis, heterogeneity models, snapshot model, trajectory model, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, structural heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review