Cited by 22Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Solution structure and synaptic analyses reveal determinants of bispecific T cell engager potency

Open access
Leithner, Alexander, Staufer, Oskar, Mitra, Tanmay, Liberta, Falk, Valvo, Salvatore, Kutuzov, Mikhail, Dada, Hannah, Spaeth, Jacob +18 more·2025·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Bispecific T cell engagers (TcEs) link T cell receptors to tumor-associated antigens on cancer cells, forming cytotoxic immunological synapses (IS). Close membrane-to-membrane contact (≤13 nm) has been proposed as a key mechanism of TcE function. To investigate this and identify potential additional mechanisms, we compared four immunoglobulin G1-based (IgG1) TcE Formats (A–D) targeting CD3ε and Her2, designed to create varying intermembrane distances (A < B < C < D). Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and modeling of the conformational states of isolated TcEs and TcE–antigen complexes predicted close contacts (≤13 nm) for Formats A and B and far contacts (≥18 nm) for Formats C and D. In supported lipid bilayer (SLB) model interfaces, Formats A and B recruited, whereas Formats C and D repelled, CD2–CD58 interactions. Formats A and B also excluded bulky Quantum dots more effectively. SAXS also revealed that TcE–antigen complexes formed by Formats A and C were less flexible than complexes formed by Formats B and D. Functional data with Her2-expressing tumor cells showed cytotoxicity, surface marker expression, and cytokine release following the order A > B = C > D. In a minimal system for IS formation on SLBs, TcE performance followed the trend A = B = C > D. Addition of close contact requiring CD58 costimulation revealed phospholipase C-γ activation matching cytotoxicity with A > B = C > D. Our findings suggest that when adhesion is equivalent, TcE potency is determined by two parameters: contact distance and flexibility. Both the close/far-contact formation axis and the low/high flexibility axis significantly impact TcE potency, explaining the similar potency of Format B (close contact/high flexibility) and C (far contact/low flexibility).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2425781122

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Leithner, A., Staufer, O., Mitra, T., Liberta, F., Valvo, S., Kutuzov, M., Dada, H., Spaeth, J., Zhou, W., Schiele, F., Reindl, S., Nar, H., Hoerer, S., Crames, M., Comeau, S., Young, D., Low, S., Jenkins, E., Davis, S. J., Klenerman, D., Nixon, A., Pefaur, N., Wyatt, D., Dushek, O., Kasturirangan, S., & Dustin, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Leithner, Alexander
  • Staufer, Oskar
  • Mitra, Tanmay
  • Liberta, Falk
  • Dustin, Michael L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
Volume
122
Issue
22
Pages
e2425781122-e2425781122
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4410889835
Cited by
22
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (J4542-B)
  • Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research (KENN 20 21 17)
  • UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X015408/1)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2018-I2M-2-002)
  • Wellcome Trust (207537/Z/Z17/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
bispecific T-cell engagers, immunological synapse, intermembrane distance, CD3ε, HER2, T cell cytotoxicity, protein flexibility, cancer immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Lipid Bilayers, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, X-Ray Diffraction, CD3 Complex, Antibodies, Bispecific, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Scattering, Small Angle, Immunological Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review