The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA bending and unbending by MutS govern mismatch recognition and specificity
Open accessAbstract
DNA mismatch repair is central to the maintenance of genomic stability. It is initiated by the recognition of base–base mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the family of MutS proteins. Subsequently, ATP induces a unique conformational change in the MutS–mismatch complex but not in the MutS–homoduplex complex that sets off the cascade of events that leads to repair. To gain insight into the mechanism by which MutS discriminates between mismatch and homoduplex DNA, we have examined the conformations of specific and nonspecific MutS–DNA complexes by using atomic force microscopy. Interestingly, MutS–DNA complexes exhibit a single population of conformations, in which the DNA is bent at homoduplex sites, but two populations of conformations, bent and unbent, at mismatch sites. These results suggest that the specific recognition complex is one in which the DNA is unbent. Combining our results with existing biochemical and crystallographic data leads us to propose that MutS: ( i ) binds to DNA nonspecifically and bends it in search of a mismatch; ( ii ) on specific recognition of a mismatch, undergoes a conformational change to an initial recognition complex in which the DNA is kinked, with interactions similar to those in the published crystal structures; and ( iii ) finally undergoes a further conformational change to the ultimate recognition complex in which the DNA is unbent. Our results provide a structural explanation for the long-standing question of how MutS achieves mismatch repair specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003
Cited by
Kunkel, T. A., & Erie, D. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationDNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V., & Modrich, P. L. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0404794 · Cited by 905
Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair in Relation to DNA Replication
Kunkel, T. A., & Erie, D. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054722 · Cited by 432
Self-citationStacked–Unstacked Equilibrium at the Nick Site of DNA
Protozanova, E., Yakovchuk, P., & Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.075 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Yang, Y., Schofield, M. J., Du, C., Fridman, Y., Lee, S. D., Larson, E. D., Drummond, J. T., Alani, E., Hsieh, P., & Erie, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-11-21
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 14822-14827
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2106826690
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA bending and unbending by MutS govern mismatch recognition and specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2433654100
- The paper
- Wang, H., Yang, Y., Schofield, M. J., Du, C., Fridman, Y., Lee, S. D., Larson, E. D., Drummond, J. T., Alani, E., Hsieh, P., & Erie, D. A. (2003). DNA bending and unbending by MutS govern mismatch recognition and specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2433654100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.