Cited by 1Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural modeling reveals the allosteric switch controlling the chitin utilization program of Vibrio cholerae

Open access
Anderson, Holly S., Dalia, Ankur B.·2025·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Signal transduction by histidine kinases (HKs) is nearly ubiquitous in bacterial species. HKs can either sense ligands directly or indirectly via a cognate solute-binding protein (SBP). The molecular basis for SBP-dependent signal reception, however, remains poorly understood in most cases. CBP and ChiS are the SBP–HK pair that activate the chitin utilization program of Vibrio cholerae . Here, we elucidate the molecular basis for allosteric regulation of CBP–ChiS by generating structural models of this complex in the unliganded and liganded states, which we support with extensive genetic, biochemical, and cell biological analysis. Our results reveal that ligand-binding induces a large conformational interface switch that is distinct from previously described SBP–HKs. Structural modeling suggests that similar interface switches may also regulate other uncharacterized SBP–HKs. Together, these results extend our understanding of signal transduction in bacterial species and highlight an approach for uncovering the molecular basis of allostery in protein complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2523358122

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1016/j.str.2015.04.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-reviews3013 · DOI
  3. 10.1128/MMBR.00020-06 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.029 · DOI
  5. 10.1128/JB.00451-09 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.2001768117 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/microorganisms9020447 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.071 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.032 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.str.2012.02.021 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1912080117 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1620183114 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0308707101 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1120096 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0307645100 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. R. Evans Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioXriv [Preprint] (2022) 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (Accessed 1 July 2025). · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/mmi.14391 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101071 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.064 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001012 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011606 · DOI
  23. C. Discovery Chai-1: Decoding the molecular interactions of life. bioXriv [Preprint] (2024) 10.1101/2024.10.10.615955 (Accessed 1 July 2025). · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6708 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.939 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1145950 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nature05626 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature06264 · DOI
  29. M. Baek Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold2. bioXriv [Preprint] (2023) 10.1101/2023.05.24.542179 (Accessed 1 July 2025). · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/s41586-024-08267-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/bioadv/vbae197 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168996 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8685-9_6 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41598-020-72387-8 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.77 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010767 · DOI
  42. H. S. Anderson A. B. Dalia Data from “Structural modeling reveals the allosteric switch controlling the chitin utilization program of Vibrio cholerae.” ModelArchive. https://modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-dal-cbpchis. Deposited 14 April 2025. · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, H. S., & Dalia, A. B.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Dalia, Ankur B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-12-04
Volume
122
Issue
49
Pages
e2523358122-e2523358122
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4417002172
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH (R35GM128674)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
Vibrio cholerae, chitin utilization, solute binding protein, histidine kinase, CBP, allosteric regulation, ligand-induced conformational change, signal transduction, protein complex structure, structural modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review