The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates
Open accessAbstract
The formation of amyloid-like aggregates by expanded polyglutamine (polyGln) sequences is suspected to play a critical role in the neuropathology of Huntington's disease and other expanded CAG-repeat diseases. To probe the folding of the polyGln sequence in the aggregate, we replaced Gln–Gln pairs at different sequence intervals with Pro–Gly pairs, elements that are compatible with β-turn formation and incompatible with β-extended chain. We find that PGQ 9 and PGQ 10 , peptides consisting of four Q 9 or Q 10 elements interspersed with PG elements, undergo spontaneous aggregation as efficiently as a Q 45 sequence, whereas the corresponding PGQ 7 and PGQ 8 peptides aggregate much less readily. Furthermore, a P D GQ 9 sequence containing d -prolines aggregates more efficiently than the peptide with l -prolines, consistent with β-turn formation in aggregate structure. Introduction of one additional Pro residue in the center of a Q 9 element within PGQ 9 completely blocks the peptide's ability to aggregate. This strongly suggests that the Q 9 elements are required to be in extended chain for efficient aggregation to occur. We determined the critical nucleus for aggregation nucleation of the PGQ 9 peptide to be one, a result identical to that for unbroken polyGln sequences. The PGQ N peptide aggregates are structurally quite similar to Q 45 aggregates, as judged by heterologous seeding aggregation kinetics, recognition by an anti-polyGln aggregate antibody, and electron microscopy. The results suggest that polyGln aggregate structure consists of alternating elements of extended chain and turn. In the future it should be possible to conduct detailed and interpretable mutational studies in the PGQ 9 background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scherzinger, E., Lurz, R., Turmaine, M., Mangiarini, L., Hollenbach, B., Hasenbank, R., Bates, G. P., Davies, S. W., Lehrach, H., & Wanker, E. E. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80514-0 · Cited by 1,291
Cited by
Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease
Ross, C. A., & Poirier, M. A. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1066 · Cited by 3,454
Experimental Constraints on Quaternary Structure in Alzheimer's β-Amyloid Fibrils
Petkova, A. T., Yau, W.-M., & Tycko, R. (2006) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi051952q · Cited by 1,044
Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Amyloid Fibril Assembly
Wetzel, R. (2006) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar050069h · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thakur, A. K., & Wetzel, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-11-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 17014-17019
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1978672495
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.252523899
- The paper
- Thakur, A. K., & Wetzel, R. (2002). Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252523899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.