Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates

Open access
Thakur, Ashwani K., Wetzel, Ronald·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The formation of amyloid-like aggregates by expanded polyglutamine (polyGln) sequences is suspected to play a critical role in the neuropathology of Huntington's disease and other expanded CAG-repeat diseases. To probe the folding of the polyGln sequence in the aggregate, we replaced Gln–Gln pairs at different sequence intervals with Pro–Gly pairs, elements that are compatible with β-turn formation and incompatible with β-extended chain. We find that PGQ 9 and PGQ 10 , peptides consisting of four Q 9 or Q 10 elements interspersed with PG elements, undergo spontaneous aggregation as efficiently as a Q 45 sequence, whereas the corresponding PGQ 7 and PGQ 8 peptides aggregate much less readily. Furthermore, a P D GQ 9 sequence containing d -prolines aggregates more efficiently than the peptide with l -prolines, consistent with β-turn formation in aggregate structure. Introduction of one additional Pro residue in the center of a Q 9 element within PGQ 9 completely blocks the peptide's ability to aggregate. This strongly suggests that the Q 9 elements are required to be in extended chain for efficient aggregation to occur. We determined the critical nucleus for aggregation nucleation of the PGQ 9 peptide to be one, a result identical to that for unbroken polyGln sequences. The PGQ N peptide aggregates are structurally quite similar to Q 45 aggregates, as judged by heterologous seeding aggregation kinetics, recognition by an anti-polyGln aggregate antibody, and electron microscopy. The results suggest that polyGln aggregate structure consists of alternating elements of extended chain and turn. In the future it should be possible to conduct detailed and interpretable mutational studies in the PGQ 9 background.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.252523899

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Thakur, A. K., & Wetzel, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-11-20
Volume
99
Issue
26
Pages
17014-17019
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1978672495
Cited by
209
References
1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.252523899
The paper
Thakur, A. K., & Wetzel, R. (2002). Mutational analysis of the structural organization of polyglutamine aggregates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252523899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.