The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotics such as erythromycin and rifampicin, at low concentrations, alter global bacterial transcription patterns as measured by the stimulation or inhibition of a variety of promoter– lux reporter constructs in a Salmonella typhimurium library. Analysis of a 6,500-clone library indicated that as many as 5% of the promoters may be affected, comprising genes for a variety of functions, as well as a significant fraction of genes with no known function. Studies of a selection of the reporter clones showed that stimulation varied depending on the nature of the antibiotic, the promoter, and what culture medium was used; the response differed on solid as compared with liquid media. Transcription was markedly reduced in antibiotic-resistant hosts, but the presence of mutations deficient in stress responses such as SOS or universal stress did not prevent antibiotic-induced modulation. The results show that small molecules may have contrasting effects on bacteria depending on their concentration: either the modulation of bacterial metabolism by altering transcription patterns or the inhibition of growth by the inhibition of specific target functions. Both activities could play important roles in the regulation of microbial communities. These studies indicate that the detection of pharmaceutically useful natural product inhibitors could be effectively achieved by measuring activation of transcription at low concentrations in high-throughput assays using appropriate bacterial promoter–reporter constructs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The multifaceted roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature
Sengupta, S., Chattopadhyay, M. K., & Grossart, H.-P. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00047 · Cited by 629
SOS Response Induction by ß-Lactams and Bacterial Defense Against Antibiotic Lethality
Miller, C., Thomsen, L. E., Gaggero, C., Mosseri, R., Ingmer, H., & Cohen, S. N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1101630 · Cited by 584
High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis
Patwardhan, R. P., Lee, C., Litvin, O., Young, D. L., Pe'er, D., & Shendure, J. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1589 · Cited by 377
Diffusible signals and interspecies communication in bacteria
Ryan, R. P., & Dow, J. M. (2008) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.2008/017871-0 · Cited by 284
Nonoptimal microbial response to antibiotics underlies suppressive drug interactions
Bollenbach, T., Quan, S., Chait, R., & Kishony, R. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.025 · Cited by 227
Antibiotic research in the age of omics: from expression profiles to interspecies communication
Wecke, T., & Mascher, T. (2011) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkr373 · Cited by 62
Ricaurte, D., Huang, Y., Sheth, R. U., Gelsinger, D. R., Kaufman, A., & Wang, H. H. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01581-x · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Goh, E.-B., Yim, G., Tsui, W., McClure, J., Surette, M. G., & Davies, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-12-13
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 17025-17030
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1977653510
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.