The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree
Open accessAbstract
Every plant species examined to date harbors endophytic fungi within its asymptomatic aerial tissues, such that endophytes represent a ubiquitous, yet cryptic, component of terrestrial plant communities. Fungal endophytes associated with leaves of woody angiosperms are especially diverse; yet, fundamental aspects of their interactions with hosts are unknown. In contrast to the relatively species-poor endophytes that are vertically transmitted and act as defensive mutualists of some temperate grasses, the diverse, horizontally transmitted endophytes of woody angiosperms are thought to contribute little to host defense. Here, we document high diversity, spatial structure, and host affinity among foliar endophytes associated with a tropical tree ( Theobroma cacao , Malvaceae) across lowland Panama. We then show that inoculation of endophyte-free leaves with endophytes isolated frequently from naturally infected, asymptomatic hosts significantly decreases both leaf necrosis and leaf mortality when T. cacao seedlings are challenged with a major pathogen ( Phytophthora sp.). In contrast to reports of fungal inoculation inducing systemic defense, we found that protection was primarily localized to endophyte-infected tissues. Further, endophyte-mediated protection was greater in mature leaves, which bear less intrinsic defense against fungal pathogens than do young leaves. In vitro studies suggest that host affinity is mediated by leaf chemistry, and that protection may be mediated by direct interactions of endophytes with foliar pathogens. Together, these data demonstrate the capacity of diverse, horizontally transmitted endophytes of woody angiosperms to play an important but previously unappreciated role in host defense.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex
Damm, U., Cannon, P. F., Woudenberg, J. H. C., & Crous, P. W. (2012) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0010 · Cited by 979
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype
Whipps, J. M., Hand, P., Pink, D., & Bending, G. D. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03906.x · Cited by 532
Bae, H., Sicher, R. C., Kim, M. S., Kim, S.-H., Strem, M. D., Melnick, R. L., & Bailey, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp165 · Cited by 490
Disease-induced changes in plant microbiome assembly and functional adaptation
Gao, M., Xiong, C., Gao, C., Tsui, C. K. M., Wang, M.-M., Zhou, X., Zhang, A.-M., & Cai, L. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01138-2 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, A. E., Mejía, L. C., Kyllo, D., Rojas, E. I., Maynard, Z., Robbins, N., & Herre, E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-11
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15649-15654
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2110001740
- Cited by
- 1,400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2533483100
- The paper
- Arnold, A. E., Mejía, L. C., Kyllo, D., Rojas, E. I., Maynard, Z., Robbins, N., & Herre, E. A. (2003). Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533483100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.