The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An efficient proteomics method to identify the cellular targets of protein kinase inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
Small molecule inhibitors of protein kinases are widely used in signal transduction research and are emerging as a major class of drugs. Although interpretation of biological results obtained with these reagents critically depends on their selectivity, efficient methods for proteome-wide assessment of kinase inhibitor selectivity have not yet been reported. Here, we address this important issue and describe a method for identifying targets of the widely used p38 kinase inhibitor SB 203580. Immobilization of a suitable SB 203580 analogue and thoroughly optimized biochemical conditions for affinity chromatography permitted the dramatic enrichment and identification of several previously unknown protein kinase targets of SB 203580. In vitro kinase assays showed that cyclin G-associated kinase (GAK) and CK1 were almost as potently inhibited as p38α whereas RICK [Rip-like interacting caspase-like apoptosis-regulatory protein (CLARP) kinase/Rip2/CARDIAK] was even more sensitive to inhibition by SB 203580. The cellular kinase activity of RICK, a known signal transducer of inflammatory responses, was already inhibited by submicromolar concentrations of SB 203580 in intact cells. Therefore, our results warrant a reevaluation of the vast amount of data obtained with SB 203580 and might have significant implications on the development of p38 inhibitors as antiinflammatory drugs. Based on the procedures described here, efficient affinity purification techniques can be developed for other protein kinase inhibitors, providing crucial information about their cellular modes of action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The specificities of protein kinase inhibitors: an update
BAIN, J., McLAUCHLAN, H., ELLIOTT, M., & COHEN, P. (2003) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20021535 · Cited by 1,369
Cited by
A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors
Fabian, M. A., Biggs, W. H., Treiber, D. K., Atteridge, C. E., Azimioara, M. D., Benedetti, M. G., Carter, T. A., Ciceri, P., Edeen, P. T., Floyd, M., et al. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1068 · Cited by 1,892
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Paul Ehrlich's magic bullet concept: 100 years of progress
Strebhardt, K., & Ullrich, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2394 · Cited by 1,457
Banaszynski, L. A., Chen, L.-C., Maynard-Smith, L. A., Ooi, A. G. L., & Wandless, T. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.025 · Cited by 902
Diversity and versatility of p38 kinase signalling in health and disease
Canovas, B., & Nebreda, A. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00322-w · Cited by 657
Metadata
- Authors
- Godl, K., Wissing, J., Kurtenbach, A., Habenberger, P., Blencke, S., Gutbrod, H., Salassidis, K., Stein-Gerlach, M., Missio, A., Cotten, M., & Daub, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15434-15439
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2073206600
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficient proteomics method to identify the cellular targets of protein kinase inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2535024100
- The paper
- Godl, K., Wissing, J., Kurtenbach, A., Habenberger, P., Blencke, S., Gutbrod, H., Salassidis, K., Stein-Gerlach, M., Missio, A., Cotten, M., & Daub, H. (2003). An efficient proteomics method to identify the cellular targets of protein kinase inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2535024100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.