The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fear of novelty in infant rats predicts adult corticosterone dynamics and an early death
Open accessAbstract
Individuals who are fearful of novelty have a larger hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response than do nonfearful individuals. We hypothesized that a fearful behavioral style emerging early in life would be associated with life-long altered adrenal activity. Because there is ample physiological evidence both costs and benefits of adrenal activation, we determined whether such a stable emotional-neuroendocrine trait was associated with differential morbidity and mortality. To conduct such lifespan work, we studied a relatively short-lived mammal: the Norway rat. We first established that an animal's hesitation or willingness to explore a novel environment (“neophobia” and “neophilia,” respectively) is an identifiable and stable behavioral trait in young-adult males and that neophobia, compared with neophilia, was associated with a greater glucocorticoid response to novelty. Second, we were able to detect behavioral differences among infant rats within a family, and this behavioral disposition at infancy predicted the magnitude of the glucocorticoid response in late middle age. Males identified as neophobic during infancy died sooner than their less fearful brothers. Although both types of males died with similar pathologies (tumors), neophobic males were 60% more likely to die at any point in time. This lifespan study identifies an emotional trait in infancy that predicts an early death and an associated neuroendocrine trait in adulthood that is a potential mechanism underlying the relationship between behavioral style and longevity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Sleep Loss Results in an Elevation of Cortisol Levels the Next Evening
(1997) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/20.10.865 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain
McEwen, B. S. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2006 · Cited by 5,429
Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00010.x · Cited by 3,132
McEwen, B. S. (2008) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.071 · Cited by 1,864
Stress Effects on Neuronal Structure: Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex
McEwen, B. S., Nasca, C., & Gray, J. D. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.171 · Cited by 1,574
Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis
Smith, B. R., & Blumstein, D. T. (2008) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arm144 · Cited by 1,450
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavigelli, S. A., & McClintock, M. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-12
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 16131-16136
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126793004
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fear of novelty in infant rats predicts adult corticosterone dynamics and an early death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2535721100
- The paper
- Cavigelli, S. A., & McClintock, M. K. (2003). Fear of novelty in infant rats predicts adult corticosterone dynamics and an early death. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2535721100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.