Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 789

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES

Open access
Morton, Newton E., Crow, James F., Muller, H. J.·1956·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

6 Here and later we are making the simplifying assumption that a pre-existing mutant allele has the same effect on viability as the new mutant.This is justified as a first approximation by the observation that compounds of mutants are often near the average of the mutant homozygotes.'his formula is given for only two alleles, but the extension to a larger number is obvious and the linearity in F remains.In applying this to a real population, we assume F = 0 for all individuals not known to come from a consanguineous marriage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.42.11.855

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 789

Metadata

Authors
Morton, N. E., Crow, J. F., & Muller, H. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1956-11
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
855-863
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2040560871
Cited by
789
References
0
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.42.11.855
The paper
Morton, N. E., Crow, J. F., & Muller, H. J. (1956). AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.42.11.855

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.