The DOI matches its Crossref record.
REVERSAL OF MUTANT PHENOTYPES BY 5-FLUOROURACID: AN APPROACH TO NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES IN MESSENGER-RNA
Open accessAbstract
Genetic information in DNA is apparently expressed via transcription into RNA messengers [1-5,10] which in turn act as the templates for protein synthesis. Thus, incorporation of base analogues into messenger-RNA could lead to errors in the reading of the message into an amino acid sequence. The effect would be an alteration of phenotype without a permanent change in the DNA genotype. A promising analogue for this purpose is 5-fluorouracil (5FU), which is readily incorporated into RNA, mostly in place of uracil [6]. Modification of proteins by 5FU has been reported by Naono and Gros [7] and by Bussard et al. [8] who found that the enzymes alkaline phosphatase and β-galactosidase synthesized in the presence of the analogue are abnormal. \n \nA very sensitive method for the detection of induced errors in the translation of genetic information is to begin with a mutant that is defective in some function so that errors causing the appearance of a small amount of activity can be easily observed. This approach has been successful [9] using rII mutants of phage T4, which are ordinarily unable to grow on strain K of E. coli. Addition of 5FU after infection of the cell can partially reverse the phage mutant phenotype, leading to active development of the phage. The response is highly specific, occurring only with certain rnI mutants and not others within the same cistron. Since, after phage infection, synthesis of ribosomal RNA and S-RNA is almost totally arrested [10], it is plausible that the effect of 5FU on phage mutants is due to its incorporation into messenger-RNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence for repair-replication of ultraviolet damaged DNA in bacteria
Pettijohn, D., & Hanawalt, P. (1964) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80216-3 · Cited by 515
Genetic Code: The ‘Nonsense’ Triplets for Chain Termination and their Suppression
BRENNER, S., STRETTON, A. O. W., & KAPLAN, S. (1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/206994a0 · Cited by 366
Virus-Specific Double-Stranded RNA in Poliovirus-Infected Cells
Baltimore, D., Becker, Y., & Darnell, J. E. (1964) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.143.3610.1034 · Cited by 130
(1967) · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60951-4 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Champe, S. P., & Benzer, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1962-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-546
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2019563323
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVERSAL OF MUTANT PHENOTYPES BY 5-FLUOROURACID: AN APPROACH TO NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES IN MESSENGER-RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.48.4.532
- The paper
- Champe, S. P., & Benzer, S. (1962). REVERSAL OF MUTANT PHENOTYPES BY 5-FLUOROURACID: AN APPROACH TO NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES IN MESSENGER-RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.48.4.532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.