Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Release factors differing in specificity for terminator codons.

Open access
Scolnick, E, Tompkins, R, Caskey, T, Nirenberg, M·1968·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In a previous paper, initiator and terminator trinucleotides were shown to stimulate sequentially the binding of f-Met-tRNA to ribosomes and the release of free f-methionine from the ribosomal intermediate.1The formation of f-methio- nine was dependent upon a terminator codon, such as UGA, UAA, or UAG, and the release factor R discovered by Capecchi.2The separation of R into two components is described in this report.R1 cor- responds to the codons UAA and UAG; R2, to UAA and UGA.Methods.-R assay: The termination assay is described elsewhere.1Each reaction contained the following components in a final volume of 50 Al: 0.05 M Tris-acetate, pH 7.2; 0.03 M magnesium acetate; 0.05 M potassium acetate; 4-6 AMmoles of the (f ['H]- Met-tRNAf ..AUG.-.Ribosome) complex (4.0-6.7 A/Amoles of TCA-precipitable f ['H]- Met-tRNAf, 0.02 A2W0 unit was present/reaction); 0.96 A260 unit-of E. coli B ribosomes (washed with 0.5 M ammonium chloride); 0.17 mumole of AUG; and, where indicated, 7-7.7 mInmoles of terminator trinucleotide, and an R preparation.Reactions were incu- bated for 16 min at 30°unless otherwise stated; hence, the rate of f [3H]-methionine formation was determined in all experiments.The preparation of tRNAfMet (E. coli B), fractionated by benzoylated-DEAE-cellulose column chromatography,' was the gift of Dr. Michael Wilcox.The tRNAfmet was acylated with ['H]-methyl-methionine (3.1 c/mmole, Schwarz BioResearch Corp.) and then converted to f['H]-Met-tRNAfMet.lRibosomes were obtained from E. coli B as described by Lucas-Lenard and Lipmann,4 except that seven, rather than five, 0.5 M ammonium chloride washes were employed.R fractionation: Escherichia coli B supernatant and ribosome fractions, treated with DNase but not "preincubated," were prepared as described previously,5 except that cells were lysed with a French pressure cell at 18,000 psi, 0.005 M DTT replaced ,B-mercaptoethanol, and extracts were centrifuged for 5 hr at 137,000 X g.Release factors (prep.A, Table 1) were obtained as follows: R was precipitated by the addition of 116 gm of ammonium sulfate to 359 ml of the S-137 fraction; the pH was maintained at 7.8 by the addition of 0.5 N ammonium hydroxide.All steps were per- formed at 4°.The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 30,000 X g for 15 min, dissolved in 139 ml of buffer A (0.05 M Tris-chloride, pH 8.0; 0.15 M potassium chloride; 0.001 M EDTA, adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH; and 0.003 M DTT) and dialyzed against

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.61.2.768

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Scolnick, E., Tompkins, R., Caskey, T., & Nirenberg, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1968-10
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
768-774
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2027656887
Cited by
377
References
0
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Release factors differing in specificity for terminator codons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.61.2.768
The paper
Scolnick, E., Tompkins, R., Caskey, T., & Nirenberg, M. (1968). Release factors differing in specificity for terminator codons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.61.2.768

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.