The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alteration of the Relative Stability of dA·dT and dG·dC Base Pairs in DNA
Open accessAbstract
Several small alkylammonium ions can eliminate, or even reverse, the usual dependence of the DNA transition temperature on base composition. For example, in 3 M tetramethylammonium chloride, or 2.4 M tetraethylammonium chloride, DNAs of different base compositions all melt at a common temperature, and with a greatly decreased breadth of transition reflecting only the sequence-independent components of melting cooperativity. At still higher concentrations of such additives, dG·dC-rich DNAs melt at lower temperatures than dA·dT-rich molecules. Circular dichroism spectra show that these additives alter the structure of the DNA double helix very little at room temperature. This differential (base-specific) effect on helix stability is investigated with several small additives related to the tetraalkylammonium ions. Additives larger than tetraethylammonium ion have little differential effect on helix stability. Preferential binding of ions to dA·dT base pairs, requiring fit into a “groove” of DNA, is consistent with these data and with equilibrium binding studies. These differential effects can be distinguished from general destabilizing effects, which are independent of specific features of macromolecular conformation or chemistry. Possible experimental uses of this ability to alter the base-composition-dependent components of the stability of the DNA helix are discussed, as well as the insight this phenomenon provides into the molecular basis for the differential stability of dA·dT and dG·dC base pairs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Isolation and characterization of genomic and cDNA clones of human erythropoietin
Jacobs, K., Shoemaker, C., Rudersdorf, R., Neill, S. D., Kaufman, R. J., Mufson, A., Seehra, J., Jones, S. S., Hewick, R., Fritsch, E. F., et al. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/313806a0 · Cited by 1,080
Southern, E. M., Maskos, U., & Elder, J. K. (1992) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(92)90014-j · Cited by 377
New specificity and yield enhancer of polymerase chain reactions
Kovarova, M., & Draber, P. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.13.e70 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Melchior, W. B., & Von Hippel, P. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1973-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-302
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1529482136
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alteration of the Relative Stability of dA·dT and dG·dC Base Pairs in DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.70.2.298
- The paper
- Melchior, W. B., & Von Hippel, P. H. (1973). Alteration of the Relative Stability of dA·dT and dG·dC Base Pairs in DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.2.298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.