The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for ovarian “inhibin”: Suppression of the secondary rise in serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in proestrous rats by injection of porcine follicular fluid
Open accessAbstract
The present studies were carried out to see if porcine follicular fluid could inhibit increases in serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels when injected into the rat. For these studies the pentobarbital-treated proestrous rat was chosen as the major test animal model. If an artificial surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) is administered to these rats, it can induce a synchronized secondary rise in FSH secretion rate. Normal saline-treated rats were also used as test animals. They exhibit preovulatory endogenous “surges” of LH and FSH, and also a secondary FSH rise. Porcine follicular fluid was harvested from medium-sized and large (3- to 10-mm diameter) follicles and treated with charcoal to remove endogenous steroids. Charcoal-treated porcine serum served as a control solution. The fluid was injected intraperitoneally in two 0.5-ml doses into pentobarbital-treated proestrous rats immediately and 3 hr after LH injection. Follicular fluid, but not the serum, suppressed the secondary, LH-induced FSH rise ( P < 0.01) in a dose-dependent manner, without altering the effects of LH upon serum ovarian steroid levels or follicular rupture. It was effective down to a total dose of 200 μl. Porcine follicular fluid also blocked the secondary FSH surge in normal proestrous rats exhibiting endogenous LH/FSH primary surges. Thus, it would appear that porcine follicular fluid contains a non-steroidal substance(s) that can block the secretion of FSH that is secondary to a natural or artificial LH surge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ling, N., Ying, S. Y., Ueno, N., Esch, F., Denoroy, L., & Guillemin, R. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.21.7217 · Cited by 435
The Ovarian Triad of the Primate Menstrual Cycle
GOODMAN, A. L., & HODGEN, G. D. (1983) · Proceedings of the 1982 Laurentian Hormone Conference · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-571139-5.50005-7 · Cited by 178
Durán-Pastén, M. L., & Fiordelisio, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00127 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, N. B., & Channing, C. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1977-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5721-5724
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1999763734
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for ovarian “inhibin”: Suppression of the secondary rise in serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in proestrous rats by injection of porcine follicular fluid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5721
- The paper
- Schwartz, N. B., & Channing, C. P. (1977). Evidence for ovarian “inhibin”: Suppression of the secondary rise in serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in proestrous rats by injection of porcine follicular fluid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.