The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease.
Open accessAbstract
The recA and lexA proteins of EScherichia coli are involved in a complex regulatory circuit that allows the expression of a diverse set of functions after DNA damage or inhibition of DNA replication. Exponentially growing cells contain a low level of recA protein, and genetic evidence suggests that lexA protein is involved in its regulation, perhaps as a simple repressor. Recent models for recA derepression after DNA damage have suggested that an early event in this process is the proteolytic cleavage of lexA protein, leading to high-level expression of recA. We present several lines of evidence that the specific protease activity of the recA protein, previously described with the lambda repressor as substrate, is capable of cleaving the wild-type lexA+ protein. First, lexA protein can be cleaved in vitro under the same conditions as prevously described for lambda repressor cleavage in a reaction requring both recA protease and ATP or an analogue, adenosine 5'-[lambda-thio]-triphosphate. Second, lexA protein can be observed in vivo as a physical entity after infection with lambda lexA+ transducing phage of host strains containing ittle or no active protease, but not in strains containing high levels of active protease. Finally, infection of host cells containing active protease with a lambda lexA+ transducing phage does not lead to repression of recA, but does so in cells lacking active protease. In all of these conditions the mutant lexA3 protein is largely resistant to inactivation or cleavage; this resistance can explain the dominant phenotype of lexA3 over lexA+. We discuss models for recA derepression and re-establishment of repression which propose that modulation of the protease activity of recA protein regulates both of these transitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli
Walker, G. C. (1984) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.48.1.60-93.1984 · Cited by 1,770
Stress-Induced Mutagenesis in Bacteria
Bjedov, I., Tenaillon, O., Gérard, B., Souza, V., Denamur, E., Radman, M., Taddei, F., & Matic, I. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082240 · Cited by 587
Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors.
Little, J. W. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.5.1375 · Cited by 508
Self-citationAn inducible DNA replication–cell division coupling mechanism in E. coli
Huisman, O., & D'Ari, R. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290797a0 · Cited by 451
Mutagenesis and stress responses induced in Escherichia coli by hydrogen peroxide
Imlay, J. A., & Linn, S. (1987) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.169.7.2967-2976.1987 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, J. W., Edmiston, S. H., Pacelli, L. Z., & Mount, D. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3225-3229
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2031010426
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.77.6.3225
- The paper
- Little, J. W., Edmiston, S. H., Pacelli, L. Z., & Mount, D. W. (1980). Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.6.3225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.