The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The fate of 8-methoxypsoralen photoinduced crosslinks in nuclear and mitochondrial yeast DNA: comparison of wild-type and repair-deficient strains.
Open accessAbstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, after 8-methoxypsoralen [8-(OMe)Ps] photoaddition, more crosslinks are induced per unit dose in mitochondrial DNA than in nuclear DNA. In wild-type cells treated in the exponential phase of growth, single- and double-strand breaks are produced during crosslink removal and then are rejoined upon postexposure incubation. The incision step is almost blocked in the rad 3-2 mutant, which is also defective in excision-repair of UV-induced (254 nm) pyrimidine dimers. The cutting of crosslinks from nuclear DNA is depressed in wild-type stationary-phase cells. This is correlated with a higher sensitivity of such cells to 8-(OMe)Ps photoinduced cell killing. The incision of crosslinks is dramatically reduced in mitochondrial DNA. The rejoining of single- and double-strand breaks is not only dependent on the product of the RAD51 gene (as shown by others) but also of the PSO2 gene. A correlation was found between the ability to recombine and strand rejoining. Therefore, as in bacteria, both the excision and the recombinational repair systems are involved in crosslink repair in yeast. However, double-strand breaks in yeast constitute repair intermediates which are not detected in Escherichia coli. The LD37 (dose necessary to induce a mean of one lethal hit per cell) corresponds to about 120 crosslinks per genome in exponential-phase cells of the wild type and to 1-2 crosslinks in the pso2-1 mutant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links
Dronkert, M. L. G., & Kanaar, R. (2001) · Mutation Research/DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/s0921-8777(01)00092-1 · Cited by 555
Formation and Repair of Interstrand Cross-Links in DNA
Noll, D. M., Mason, T. M., & Miller, P. S. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040478b · Cited by 484
Silva, I. U. D., McHugh, P. J., Clingen, P. H., & Hartley, J. A. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/.20.21.7980-7990.2000 · Cited by 441
DNA damage and mutagenesis induced by nitrogen mustards
Povirk, L. F., & Shuker, D. E. (1994) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0165-1110(94)90015-9 · Cited by 297
Recent advances in psoralen phototoxicity mechanism
Averbeck, D. (1989) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb02917.x · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Magaña-Schwencke, N., Henriques, J. A., Chanet, R., & Moustacchi, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1722-1726
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2041614659
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The fate of 8-methoxypsoralen photoinduced crosslinks in nuclear and mitochondrial yeast DNA: comparison of wild-type and repair-deficient strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.79.6.1722
- The paper
- Magaña-Schwencke, N., Henriques, J. A., Chanet, R., & Moustacchi, E. (1982). The fate of 8-methoxypsoralen photoinduced crosslinks in nuclear and mitochondrial yeast DNA: comparison of wild-type and repair-deficient strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.6.1722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.