Mevinolin and colestipol stimulate receptor-mediated clearance of low density lipoprotein from plasma in familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes.
Open accessAbstract
In subject with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a 50% deficiency of receptors for plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) impairs the removal of LDL from plasma and produces hypercholesterolemia. In these patients mevinolin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, blocks cholesterol synthesis and lowers plasma LDL levels. To determine the mechanism for the LDL-lowering effect, we administered 131I-labeled LDL intravenously to six FH heterozygotes before and during treatment with mevinolin and calculated the apparent fractional catabolic rate (FCR) and synthetic rate for LDL. After mevinolin treatment, the mean plasma LDL-cholesterol level declined from 262 to 191 mg/dl (27% decrease), the mean FCR for 131I-labeled LDL increased from 0.30 to 0.41 pools per day (37% increase), and the mean calculated synthetic rate for LDL-protein did not change significantly. In one of FH heterozygote with an ileal bypass and in another who received colestipol, the addition of mevinolin caused, respectively, a 41% and 60% decrease in plasma LDL levels and a 60% and 100% increase in the FCR for plasma LDL. The contribution of receptor-dependent pathways to the FCR for plasma LDL was estimated in three FH heterozygotes by simultaneous measurements of the FCR for native 131I-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled glucosylated LDL, which does not bind to LDL receptors. Whereas the removal rate for native LDL increased after mevinolin treatment, the removal rate for glucosylated LDL did not change. The current data suggest that mevinolin alone or mevinolin plus bile acid depletion (i.e., ileal bypass or colestipol therapy) decreases plasma LDL levels primarily by raising the number of LDL receptors and, thus, enhancing the removal of LDL from plasma.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 557
- Authors
- Bilheimer, D. W., Grundy, S. M., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4124-4128
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC394213
- OpenAlex
- W2067635119
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 43.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Keywords
- lovastatin, colestipol, familial hypercholesterolemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, low-density lipoprotein, LDL receptor, receptor-mediated clearance, fractional catabolic rate, ileal bypass, cholesterol synthesis inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Anticholesteremic Agents, Colestipol, Genetic Carrier Screening, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Kinetics, Lipoproteins, LDL, Lovastatin, Naphthalenes, Polyamines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review